吉川 武

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to directly compare diagnostic capability of inguinal herniation between upright area-detector CT (ADCT) and conventional supine ADCT under the Valsalva maneuver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 209 patients with 360 inguinal herniations and 123 patients without inguinal hernias. All patients underwent supine and upright ADCT for the evaluation of abdominal wall hernias within one week between May 2023 and March 2024. From this cohort, a total of 120 of 360 inguinal hernias and 120 of 304 non-inguinal hernias were computationally selected, and the probability of hernia was visually assessed by two board-certified general and abdominal radiologists with 5-point scales to assess subtypes of herniation. The final score for each hernia was determined as consensus of two investigators. To determine the capability of diagnosis for inguinal herniation in selected lesion groups, diagnostic performance was compared between upright and supine ADCTs using an ROC analysis. Then, sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and accuracy (AC) for differentiation of inguinal from non-inguinal hernias were compared between the two methods using McNemar's test. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) of upright ADCT (AUC = 0.96) was significantly larger than that of supine ADCT (AUC = 0.93, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity (SE) and accuracy (AC) of upright ADCT (SE: 87.5 %, AC: 93.8 %) were significantly higher than those of supine ADCT (SE: 73.3 %, p < 0.0001; AC: 86.7 %, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Upright ADCT has better potential for the diagnosis and subtype classification of inguinal herniation than conventional supine ADCT when applied under the Valsalva maneuver.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of conjugate gradient reconstruction (CG Recon) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for reducing scan time while maintaining the image quality and nodule detection capability on lung MRI with ultrashort TE (UTE-MRI) as compared with grid reconstruction (Grid Recon). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the in vitro and in vivo studies, the NEMA phantom and 35 patients with pulmonary nodules were scanned by UTE-MRI with original (TEoriginal), 1/2 (UTE1/2), and 1/4 (UTE1/4) spoke numbers obtained by both methods and reconstructed with and without DLR. In this study, the standard protocol was UTEoriginal obtained by Grid Recon without DLR. Then, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the phantom, lung and lesion were assessed. In the in vivo study, overall image quality and nodule detection capability were visually assessed on each UTE-MRI. Quantitative and qualitative indices were then compared between the standard protocol and others. Finally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the standard and other protocols. RESULTS: In in vitro and in vivo studies, all SNRs were significantly different between the standard protocol and each UTE-MRI with CG Recon and DLR (p < 0.05). Overall image quality of the standard protocol differed significantly from that of all UTE1/4s (p < 0.05). The area under the curve of each UTEOriginal obtained by CG Recon was significantly larger than that of the standard protocol (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CG Recon and DLR can reduce scan time while maintaining image quality and nodule detection capabilities on lung UTE-MRI. KEY POINTS: Question To determine the utility of conjugate gradient reconstruction (CG Recon) to reduce scan time without nodule detection capability on MRI with ultrashort TE (UTE-MRI). Findings Nodule detection capability was not significantly decreased by CG Recon with or without deep learning reconstruction when reducing scan time from the standard UTE-MRI protocol. Clinical relevance Conjugate gradient reconstruction (CG Recon) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) have the potential to reduce scan time while maintaining image quality and nodule detection capability in lung MR imaging with ultrashort TE.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the capability of dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE-) perfusion area-detector CT (ADCT) for detecting pathological structural changes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive stage I NSCLC patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) underwent dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT analyzed by dual-input maximum slope (DMS) methods for total, pulmonary arterial and systemic arterial perfusion (TPDMS, PAPDMS and SAPDMS) maps, surgical treatment and pathological examination. Multicentric ROIs were then placed over sites assessed as normal lung, pulmonary emphysema, GGO or reticular pattern without traction bronchiectasis, reticular pattern with traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing in the resected lung. Next, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) multiple comparison test was performed for a comparison of each of the perfusion parameters for five groups. Finally, discrimination accuracy for evaluation of lung parenchymal change was compared for all indexes and combined methods. RESULTS: PAPDMSs of abnormal lungs were significantly lower than that of normal lungs (p < 0.0001). SAPDMSs of normal or emphysematous lungs were significantly lower than those of others (p < 0.0001). SAPDMS of GGO or reticular pattern without traction bronchiectasis was significantly lower than that for reticular pattern with traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing (p < 0.0001). Discrimination accuracy of combined perfusion index was significantly higher than that of each index (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT is useful for detecting pathological structural changes in stage I NSCLC patients with PF-ILD. KEY POINTS: Question Can dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion matrices evaluate parenchymal lung changes and disease severity of parenchymal diseases in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients? Findings Perfusion indexes differentiated significantly among normal lung, emphysema, GGO or reticular pattern without traction bronchiectasis, reticular pattern with traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing and significantly improved discrimination accuracy by combined methods. Clinical relevance Dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion area-detector CT has the potential to assess underlying pathologies and pulmonary functional changes in stage I non-small cell carcinoma patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare coronary arterial stenosis evaluations by hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR), model-based IR (MBIR), deep learning reconstruction (DLR), and high-resolution deep learning reconstruction (HR-DLR) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in both in vitro and in vivo studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the in vitro study, a total of three-vessel tube phantoms with diameters of 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm and with simulated non-calcified stepped stenosis plaques with degrees of 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% stenosis were scanned with area-detector CT (ADCT) and ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT). Then, ADCT data were reconstructed using all methods, although UHR-CT data were reconstructed with hybrid-type IR, MBIR, and DLR. For the in vivo study, patients who had undergone CCTA at ADCT were retrospectively selected, and each CCTA data set was reconstructed with all methods. To compare the image noise and measurement accuracy at each of the stenosis levels, image noise, and inner diameter were evaluated and statistically compared. To determine the effect of HR-DLR on CAD-RADS evaluation accuracy, the accuracy of CAD-RADS categorization of all CCTAs was compared by using McNemar's test. RESULTS: The image noise of HR-DLR was significantly lower than that of others on ADCT and UHR-CT (p < 0.0001). At a 50% and 75% stenosis level for each phantom, hybrid-type IR showed a significantly larger mean difference on ADCT than did others (p < 0.05). At in vivo study, 31 patients were included. Accuracy on HR-DLR was significantly higher than that on hybrid-type IR, MBIR, or DLR (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: HR-DLR is potentially superior for coronary arterial stenosis evaluations to hybrid-type IR, MBIR, or DLR shown on CCTA. KEY POINTS: Question How do coronary arterial stenosis evaluations by hybrid-type IR, MBIR, DLR, and HR-DLR compare to coronary CT angiography? Findings HR-DLR showed significantly lower image noise and more accurate coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) evaluation than others. Clinical relevance HR-DLR is potentially superior to other reconstruction methods for coronary arterial stenosis evaluations, as demonstrated by coronary CT angiography results on ADCT and as shown in both in vitro and in vivo studies.

PURPOSE: Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) has been recommended as useful for improving image quality. Moreover, compressed sensing (CS) or DLR has been proposed as useful for improving temporal resolution and image quality on MR sequences in different body fields. However, there have been no reports regarding the utility of DLR for image quality and T-factor assessment improvements on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), short inversion time (TI) inversion recovery (STIR) imaging, and unenhanced- and contrast-enhanced (CE) 3D fast spoiled gradient echo (GRE) imaging with and without CS in comparison with thin-section multidetector-row CT (MDCT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of DLR for improving image quality and the appropriate sequence for T-category assessment for NSCLC patients. METHODS: As subjects for this study, 213 pathologically diagnosed NSCLC patients who underwent thin-section MDCT and MR imaging as well as T-factor diagnosis were retrospectively enrolled. SNR of each tumor was calculated and compared by paired t-test for each sequence with and without DLR. T-factor for each patient was assessed with thin-section MDCT and all MR sequences, and the accuracy for T-factor diagnosis was compared among all sequences and thin-section CT by means of McNemar's test. RESULTS: SNRs of T2WI, STIR imaging, unenhanced thin-section Quick 3D imaging, and CE-thin-section Quick 3D imaging with DLR were significantly higher than SNRs of those without DLR (P < 0.05). Diagnostic accuracy of STIR imaging and CE-thick- or thin-section Quick 3D imaging was significantly higher than that of thin-section CT, T2WI, and unenhanced thick- or thin-section Quick 3D imaging (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DLR is thus considered useful for image quality improvement on MR imaging. STIR imaging and CE-Quick 3D imaging with or without CS were validated as appropriate MR sequences for T-factor evaluation in NSCLC patients.

Many promising study results as well as technical advances for chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated its academic and clinical potentials during the last few decades, although chest MRI has been used for relatively few clinical situations in routine clinical practice. However, the Fleischner Society as well as the Japanese Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine have published a few white papers to promote chest MRI in routine clinical practice. In this review, we present clinical evidence of the efficacy of chest MRI for 1) thoracic oncology and 2) pulmonary vascular diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was thus to compare capabilities for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other of pulmonary MRIs with ultra-short TE (UTE) obtained with single- and dual-echo techniques (UTE-MRISingle and UTE-MRIDual) and thin-section CT for stage IA lung cancer patients. METHODS: Ninety pathologically diagnosed stage IA lung cancer patients who underwent thin-section standard-dose CT, UTE-MRISingle, and UTE-MRIDual, surgical treatment and pathological examinations were included in this retrospective study. The largest dimension (Dlong), solid portion (solid Dlong), and consolidation/tumor (C/T) ratio of each nodule were assessed. Two-tailed Student's t-tests were performed to compare all indexes obtained with each method between non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and other lung cancers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-based positive tests were performed to determine all feasible threshold values for distinguishing non- or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) from other lung cancers. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were then compared by means of McNemar's test. RESULTS: Each index showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.0001). Specificities and accuracies of solid Dlong for UTE-MRIDual2nd echo and CTMediastinal were significantly higher than those of solid Dlong for UTE-MRISingle and UTE-MRIDual1st echo and all C/T ratios except CTMediastinal (p < 0.05). Moreover, the specificities and accuracies of solid Dlong and C/T ratio were significantly higher than those of Dlong for each method (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary MRI with UTE is considered at least as valuable as thin-section CT for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other stage IA lung cancers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Pulmonary MRI with UTE's capability for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other lung cancers in stage IA lung cancer patients is equal or superior to that of thin-section CT. KEY POINTS: • Correlations were excellent for pathologically examined nodules with the largest dimensions (Dlong) and a solid component (solid Dlong) for all indexes (0.95 ≤ r ≤ 0.99, p < 0.0001). • Pathologically examined Dlong and solid Dlong obtained with all methods showed significant differences between non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and other lung cancers (p < 0.0001). • Solid tumor components are most accurately measured by UTE-MRIDual2nd echo and CTMediastinal, whereas the ground-glass component is imaged by UTE-MRIDual1st echo and CTlung with high accuracy. UTE-MRIDual predicts tumor invasiveness with 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity at a C/T threshold of 0.5.

PURPOSE: Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) has been introduced by major vendors, tested for CT examinations of a variety of organs, and compared with other reconstruction methods. The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of DLR for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation with those of hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR) for standard-, reduced- and ultra-low-dose CTs (SDCT, RDCT and ULDCT) obtained with high-definition CT (HDCT) and reconstructed at 0.25-mm, 0.5-mm and 1-mm section thicknesses with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes for patients with various pulmonary diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty age-, gender- and body mass index-matched patients with various pulmonary diseases underwent SDCT (CT dose index volume <CTDIvol>: mean ± standard deviation, 9.0 ± 1.8 mGy), RDCT (CTDIvol: 1.7 ± 0.2 mGy) and ULDCT (CTDIvol: 0.8 ± 0.1 mGy) at a HDCT. All CT data set were then reconstructed with 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 matrixes by means of hybrid-type IR and DLR. SNR of lung parenchyma and probabilities of all lung textures were assessed for each CT data set. SNR and detection performance of each lung texture reconstructed with DLR and hybrid-type IR were then compared by means of paired t tests and ROC analyses for all CT data at each section thickness. RESULTS: Data for each radiation dose showed DLR attained significantly higher SNR than hybrid-type IR for each of the CT data (p < 0.0001). On assessments of all findings except consolidation and nodules or masses, areas under the curve (AUCs) for ULDCT with hybrid-type IR for each section thickness (0.91 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.97) were significantly smaller than those with DLR (0.97 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05) and the standard protocol (0.98 ≤ AUC ≤ 1, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DLR is potentially more effective for image quality improvement and lung texture evaluation than hybrid-type IR on all radiation dose CTs obtained at HDCT and reconstructed with each section thickness with both matrixes for patients with a variety of pulmonary diseases.

BACKGROUND. Whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI have shown encouraging results for staging of thoracic malignancy but are poorly studied for staging of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare the performance of conventional staging tests, FDG PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and FDG PET/MRI for staging of SCLC. METHODS. This prospective study included 98 patients (64 men, 34 women; median age, 74 years) with SCLC who underwent conventional staging tests (brain MRI; neck, chest, and abdominopelvic CT; and bone scintigraphy), FDG PET/CT, and whole-body MRI within 2 weeks before treatment; coregistered FDG PET/MRI was generated. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed conventional tests and FDG PET/CT examinations in separate sessions, and two chest radiologists independently reviewed whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI examinations in separate sessions. Readers assessed T, N, and M categories; TNM stage; and Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Study Group (VALSG) stage. Reader pairs subsequently reached consensus. Stages determined clinically during tumor board sessions served as the reference standard. RESULTS. Accuracy for T category was higher (p < .05) for whole-body MRI (94.9%) and FDG PET/MRI (94.9%) than for FDG PET/CT (85.7%). Accuracy for N category was higher (p < .05) for whole-body MRI (84.7%), FDG PET/MRI (83.7%), and FDG PET/CT (81.6%) than for conventional staging tests (75.5%). Accuracy for M category was higher (p < .05) for whole-body MRI (94.9%), FDG PET/MRI (94.9%), and FDG PET/CT (94.9%) than for conventional staging tests (84.7%). Accuracy for TNM stage was higher (p < .05) for whole-body MRI (88.8%) and FDG PET/MRI (86.7%) than for FDG PET/CT (77.6%) and conventional staging tests (72.4%). Accuracy for VALSG stage was higher (p < .05) for whole-body MRI (95.9%), FDG PET/MRI (95.9%), and FDG PET/CT (98.0%) than for conventional staging tests (82.7%). Interobserver agreement, expressed as kappa coefficients, ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 across imaging tests and staging endpoints. CONCLUSION. FDG PET/CT, whole-body MRI, and coregistered FDG PET/MRI outperformed conventional tests for various staging endpoints in patients with SCLC. Whole-body MRI and FDG PET/MRI outperformed FDG PET/CT for T category and thus TNM stage, indicating the utility of MRI for assessing extent of local invasion in SCLC. CLINICAL IMPACT. Incorporation of either MRI approach may improve initial staging evaluation in SCLC.

Background Deep learning may help to improve computer-aided detection of volume (CADv) measurement of pulmonary nodules at chest CT. Purpose To determine the efficacy of a deep learning method for improving CADv for measuring the solid and ground-glass opacity (GGO) volumes of a nodule, doubling time (DT), and the change in volume at chest CT. Materials and Methods From January 2014 to December 2016, patients with pulmonary nodules at CT were retrospectively reviewed. CADv without and with a convolutional neural network (CNN) automatically determined total nodule volume change per day and DT. Area under the curves (AUCs) on a per-nodule basis and diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient basis were compared among all indexes from CADv with and without CNN for differentiating benign from malignant nodules. Results The CNN training set was 294 nodules in 217 patients, the validation set was 41 nodules in 32 validation patients, and the test set was 290 nodules in 188 patients. A total of 170 patients had 290 nodules (mean size ± standard deviation, 11 mm ± 5; range, 4-29 mm) diagnosed as 132 malignant nodules and 158 benign nodules. There were 132 solid nodules (46%), 106 part-solid nodules (36%), and 52 ground-glass nodules (18%). The test set results showed that the diagnostic performance of the CNN with CADv for total nodule volume change per day was larger than DT of CADv with CNN (AUC, 0.94 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.90, 0.96] vs 0.67 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.74]; P < .001) and CADv without CNN (total nodule volume change per day: AUC, 0.69 [95% CI: 0.62, 0.75]; P < .001; DT: AUC, 0.58 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.65]; P < .001). The accuracy of total nodule volume change per day of CADv with CNN was significantly higher than that of CADv without CNN (P < .001) and DT of both methods (P < .001). Conclusion Convolutional neural network is useful for improving accuracy of computer-aided detection of volume measurement and nodule differentiation capability at CT for patients with pulmonary nodules. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the capability of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE) perfusion MR imaging with ultra-short TE and area-detector CT (ADCT), analyzed with the same mathematical methods, and that of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our institutional review board approved this study and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. A total 57 consecutive patients with 71 nodules prospectively underwent dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and MR imaging with ultra-short TE, FDG-PET/CT, as well as microbacterial and/or pathological examinations. The nodules were classified into malignant nodules (n = 45) and benign nodules (n = 26). Pulmonary arterial, systemic arterial and total perfusions were determined by means of dual-input maximum slope models on ADCT and MR imaging and maximum values of standard uptake values (SUVmax) on PET/CT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for each index, and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared by McNemar's test. RESULTS: Areas under the curve (Azs) of total perfusion on ADCT (Az = 0.89) and MR imaging (Az = 0.88) were significantly larger than those of systemic arterial perfusion and MR imaging (p<0.05). Accuracy of total perfusion on ADCT (87.3% [62/71]) and MR imaging (87.3% [62/71]) was significantly higher than that of systemic arterial perfusion for both methods (77.5% [55/71] p = 0.02) and SUVmax (78.9% [56/71], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Dynamic CE-perfusion MR imaging with ultra-short TE and ADCT and have similar potential capabilities, and are superior to FDG-PET/CT in this setting.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrashort TE (UTE) MRI has been shown to deliver high-resolution images comparable to CT images. Here we evaluate the potential of UTE-MRI for precise lung nodule characterization. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (mean [± SD] age, 68.7 ± 10.8 years) with 119 nodules or masses (mean size, 17.4 ± 16.3 mm; range, 4-88 mm) prospectively underwent CT (1-mm slice thickness) and UTE-MRI (TE, 192 μs; 1 mm3 resolution). Two radiologists assessed nodule dimensions and morphologic features (i.e., attenuation, margins, and internal lucencies), in consensus for CT and in a blinded fashion for UTE-MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated in reference to CT. RESULTS: Readers 1 and 2 underestimated the nodules' long axial diameter with UTEMRI by 1.2 ± 3.4 and 2.1 ± 4.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of UTE-MRI for subsolid attenuation were 95.9% and 70.3%, respectively, for reader 1 and 97.1% and 71.4%, respectively, for reader 2 (κ = 0.71 and 0.68). With regard to margin characteristics, for lobulation, sensitivity was 70.6% and 54.9%, and specificity was 93.2% and 96.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively; for spiculation, sensitivity was 61.5% and 48.0%, and specificity was 95.2% and 95.0%; and for pleural tags, sensitivity was 87.0% and 73.3%, and specificity was 93.8% and 95.0%. Finally, for internal lucencies, sensitivity was 72.7% and 61.3%, and specificity was 96.1% and 97.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively (κ = 0.64-0.81 for reader 1 and 0.48-0.72 for reader 2). Interreader agreement for attenuation, margin characteristics, and lucencies was substantial to almost perfect with few exceptions (κ = 0.51-0.90). CONCLUSION: UTE-MRI systematically underestimated dimension measurements by approximately 1-2 mm but otherwise showed high diagnostic properties and interreader agreement, yet unprecedented by MRI, for nodule morphologic assessment.