稲本 陽子

This study aimed to determine the impact of bolus volume on UES opening. Twenty-two healthy subjects (10 males and 12 females, 23-45 years) underwent a CT scan while swallowing 3-, 10-, and 20 ml of thin liquid. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) cross-sectional area and hyoid and laryngeal displacement were measured at every frame across three conditions. The timing of UES opening onset, UES maximum opening, and duration of UES opening were also measured. With increasing bolus volume, the UES maximum opening area increased, at the UES opening onset, at the UES maximum opening was earlier, and the duration of the UES opening prolonged. The maximum displacement of the hyoid and larynx was significantly more anteriorly and higher with a large bolus volume. However, the hyoid displacement at the timing of UES maximum opening did not change across three bolus volumes. This result suggests that the increase in the UES maximum opening area with increasing bolus volume was modulated by the bolus itself rather than by the hyoid movement.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia significantly impacts prognosis in individuals with multiple system atrophy (MSA). While video-based assessments are practical, their limited availability highlights the need for a simple tool such as the Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS) in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of the DSS in assessing dysphagia in MSA patients and its correlations with clinical indices. METHODS: We examined 43 MSA patients using the DSS and other clinical measures, including the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS) and cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. As a follow-up, 11 of 43 patients underwent a secondary DSS evaluation. Spearman's correlation and linear mixed models were used to analyze cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships. RESULTS: DSS scores were significantly correlated with UMSARS Parts 1, 2, and 4, as well as disease duration and blood pressure changes. This indicates that the DSS is sensitive to MSA-related motor and autonomic dysfunctions, and that the DSS could provide a more detailed assessment of swallowing function compared with the UMSARS Part 1 swallowing subscore. Additionally, DSS score was correlated with cerebrospinal fluid 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. Our longitudinal analysis further supported the role of DSS score as a reliable marker of dysphagia progression over time. CONCLUSIONS: The DSS is a sensitive and practical tool for evaluating dysphagia. Thus, combining the DSS and UMSARS could improve dysphagia monitoring in individuals with MSA. Our data support the use of the DSS as a valuable clinical and research tool in MSA management.

BACKGROUND: Upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) serves as an important anatomical and functional landmark during swallowing. However, the precise UES location before and during swallowing has not been well established. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine upper oesophageal sphincter (UES) location and displacement during swallowing accounting for sex, age, and height in healthy adults using 320-row area detector computed tomography (320-ADCT). METHODS: Ninety-four healthy adults (43 males; 22-90 years) underwent 320-ADCT scanning while swallowing one trial of 10 mL honey thick barium. UES location at bolus hold and at maximum displacement and vertical displacement during swallowing were identified using the coordinates and the section classification of vertebrae (VERT scale). The differences and correlations of UES location and distance in terms of sex, age, and height were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: UES locations at bolus hold and at maximum displacement were significantly lower and UES vertical displacement was significantly larger in males than in females (p < .001). UES location at bolus hold became lower with increasing age (r = -.312, p = .002), but the negative correlation was low at maximum displacement (r = -.230, p = .026), resulting in larger vertical distance with ageing. UES locations showed high negative correlation at bolus hold with height (r = -.715, p < .001), and showed moderate negative correlation at maximum displacement with height (r = -.555, p < .001), although this effect was unclear when analysed by sex. CONCLUSION: Males showed lower UES location and larger displacement than females. The impact of age was evident with lower location before swallowing and larger displacement during swallowing. Differences observed by sex were not completely explained by using the VERT scale to adjust for height.

This study evaluated the validity of pharyngeal 2D area measurements acquired from the lateral view for predicting the actual 3D volume in healthy adults during swallowing. Seventy-five healthy adults (39 females, 36 males; mean age 51.3 years) were examined using 320-row area detector computed tomography (320-ADCT). All participants swallowed a 10 mL honey-thick barium bolus upon command while seated in a 45° semi-reclining position. Multi-planar reconstruction images and dynamic 3D-CT images were obtained using Aquilion ONE software. Pharyngeal 2D area and 3D volume measurements were taken before swallowing and at the frame depicting maximum pharyngeal constriction. Pharyngeal volume before swallowing (PVhold) was accurately predicted by 2D area (R2 = 0.816). Adding height and sex to the model increased R2 to 0.836. Regarding pharyngeal volume during maximum constriction (PVmax), 2D area also exhibited acceptable predictive power (R2 = 0.777). However, analysis of statistical residuals and outliers revealed a greater tendency for prediction errors when there is less complete constriction of the pharynx as well as asymmetry in bolus flow or movement. Findings highlight the importance of routinely incorporating anterior-posterior views during VFSS exams. Future work is needed to determine clinical utility of pharyngeal volume measurements derived from 320-ADCT.

BACKGROUND: There is an extensive library of language tests, each with excellent psychometric properties; however, many of the tests available take considerable administration time, possibly bearing psychological strain on patients. The Short and Tailored Evaluation of Language Ability (STELA) is a simplified, tablet-based language ability assessment system developed to address this issue, with a reduced number of items and automated testing process. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to assess the administration time, internal consistency, and validity of the STELA. METHODS: The STELA consists of a tablet app, a microphone, and an input keypad for clinician's use. The system is designed to assess language ability with 52 questions grouped into 2 comprehension modalities (auditory comprehension and reading comprehension) and 3 expression modalities (naming and sentence formation, repetition, and reading aloud). Performance in each modality was scored as the correct answer rate (0-100), and overall performance expressed as the sum of modality scores (out of 500 points). RESULTS: The time taken to complete the STELA was significantly less than the time for the WAB (mean 16.2, SD 9.4 vs mean 149.3, SD 64.1 minutes; P<.001). The STELA's total score was strongly correlated with the WAB Aphasia Quotient (r=0.93, P<.001), supporting the former's concurrent validity concerning the WAB, which is a gold-standard aphasia assessment. Strong correlations were also observed at the subscale level; STELA auditory comprehension versus WAB auditory comprehension (r=0.75, P<.001), STELA repetition versus WAB repetition (r=0.96, P<.001), STELA naming and sentence formation versus WAB naming and word finding (r=0.81, P<.001), and the sum of STELA reading comprehension or reading aloud versus WAB reading (r=0.82, P<.001). Cronbach α obtained for each modality was .862 for auditory comprehension, .872 for reading comprehension, .902 for naming and sentence formation, .787 for repetition, and .892 for reading aloud. Global Cronbach α was .961. The average of the values of item-total correlation to each subscale was 0.61 (SD 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed significant time reduction in the assessment of language ability and provided evidence for good internal consistency and validity of the STELA tablet-based aphasia assessment system.