髙原 健

Few studies have investigated the efficacy of immuno-oncology (IO) combinations at different metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated the differential efficacy of IO-IO and IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations by metastatic site in metastatic RCC (mRCC). This retrospective multicenter study by the JK-FOOT Study Group included 579 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC (per International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria) treated with first-line IO combinations between September 2018 and December 2024. Metastatic sites were lymph nodes, lungs, bones, liver, brain, and others. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoint was objective response rate. Efficacy was compared between IO-IO and IO-TKI for each site. For lymph node (n = 36), lung (n = 132), or brain (n = 16) metastases, OS or PFS was not significantly different between IO-IO and IO-TKI. In bone metastases (n = 80), OS tended to favor IO-TKI (P = 0.053). In liver metastases (n = 22), OS was significantly longer with IO-TKI (P = 0.011). IO-TKI may be a more appropriate first-line option than IO-IO for mRCC with bone or liver metastases, while efficacy is similar for other sites.

BASCKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies have become the standard first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), frequently used to treat gastrointestinal conditions, have been implicated in modulating ICI efficacy, potentially through gut microbiome dysbiosis. However, the impact of PPIs on ICI-based therapies for mRCC remains unclear. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed 427 patients with mRCC classified as intermediate or poor risk according to the IMDC criteria treated with first-line IO-IO (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) or IO-TKI (ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor) therapies. Patients were stratified by PPI use during the 30 days before and including the day of ICI initiation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between PPI users and nonusers. RESULTS: PPI use was significantly associated with shorter OS in patients receiving IO-IO therapy (median OS, 23.34 months vs. not reached; P = .002), but not in those receiving IO-TKI therapy (P = .909). Multivariate analysis confirmed PPIs as an independent prognostic factor for OS in the IO-IO group (HR, 1.647; 95% CI, 1.007-2.693; P = .046). No significant differences in PFS or ORR were observed between PPI users and nonusers in either group, although the complete response rate was notably lower in PPI users treated with IO-IO (1.6% vs. 10.3%; P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: PPI use was associated with inferior survival in mRCC patients receiving IO-IO therapy, potentially through microbiome modulation and other immunologic or clinical mechanisms; however, these findings are based on retrospective data and should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. Caution is advised when prescribing PPIs to patients undergoing ICI-based therapy, particularly IO-IO regimens, and prospective studies are needed to confirm whether avoiding unnecessary PPI use can improve clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence on upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the older population with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is scarce. We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of ARSI plus ADT (upfront doublet therapy) and conventional ADT in mCSPC patients aged ≥ 75 years in a real-world clinical practice. METHODS: Subjects were mCSPC patients aged ≥ 75 years who received upfront doublet therapy (upfront doublet group) or ADT, either alone or in combination with bicalutamide (conventional ADT group) as a first-line systemic therapy. Castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the clinicopathological features. RESULTS: After PSM, a total of 200 mCSPC patients, 100 in the upfront doublet group and 100 in the conventional ADT group, were included. In the PSM population, median CRPC-FS was 30.8 months in the upfront doublet group and 12.1 months in the conventional ADT group (p < 0.05). Median OS was N.A. in the upfront doublet group and 45.2 months in the conventional ADT group (p < 0.05). Median CSS was also statistically different between the two groups (N.A. vs. 61.6 months; p < 0.05). In subgroup analyses, the upfront doublet group showed improved oncological outcomes in high-volume disease compared with the conventional ADT group, but not in low-volume disease. CONCLUSIONS: The oncological benefits of upfront doublet therapy are not diminished in mCSPC patients, even in the older population; but these benefits are limited when restricted to low-volume disease.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and determine the optimal timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed medical records of 447 patients with mRCC treated with ICI at multiple Japanese institutions between January 2018 and August 2023. From this cohort, 178 patients with lymph node or distant metastases received either cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN group; n = 72) or ICI therapy without cytoreductive nephrectomy (non-CN group; n = 106) as first-line treatment. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival was 15.7 months, and median overall survival was 58.1 months. CN significantly improved OS, with the CN group's median OS not reached, compared to 29.6 months in the non-CN group (p = 0.01). Deferred CN also showed improved survival outcomes. Poor prognostic factors for immediate CN included International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor risk, sarcomatoid differentiation, and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a prognostic model to guide patient selection for CN, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies.

BACKGROUND: Despite durable benefits of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), early progressive disease (PD), defined as disease progression within 3 months, occurs, and its predictors remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical factors associated with early PD in patients with mRCC treated with this regimen. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database identified 193 patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Logistic regression analyses assessed associations between clinical factors and early PD. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 17 months, patients had median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 35 and 14 months, respectively. Objective response and PD rates were 49.9% and 24.9%, respectively. Patients with early PD had significantly worse OS than those with non-early PD (10 vs. 42 months; P = 0.0002). Multivariate analyses identified bone metastasis and performance status (PS) as independent indicators of early PD (P = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). Early PD rates varied by metastatic site (lung, 19.3%; bone, 31.2%; brain, 10%; and liver, 30%). Patients with clear-cell RCC had a median OS of 48 months and PFS of 22 months. The identified variables of early PD were consistent across all patient populations evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Bone metastasis and PS predict early PD in patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab, with antitumor effect of the regimen varying by metastatic site. Clarifying the characteristics of early PD may guide clinical decision-making in treatment selection.