金尾 健人

UNLABELLED: A 71-year-old man with bone metastasis of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer was treated with androgen deprivation therapy and apalutamide. Radium-223 and radiation therapy were administered after it become castration resistant. Although prostate-specific antigen levels remained low, multiple subcutaneous metastases of neuroendocrine prostate cancer were observed. A review of the pre-treatment prostate needle biopsy revealed a small component with features suggestive of neuroendocrine differentiation. Phosphatase and tensine homolog loss and tumor protein p53 overexpression were observed, confirming the diagnosis of aggressive variant prostate cancer. Platinum-based chemotherapy was administered; however, the patient died 28 months after diagnosis. In this case, if the diagnosis of aggressive variant prostate cancer had been made at an earlier time by biopsy specimens, there might have been a possibility to improve the prognosis by the earlier introduction of the platinum-based regimen. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13691-024-00673-7.

Choroidal metastasis originating from renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) is rare. To the best of our knowledge, 31 cases of choroidal metastasis from RCC have been reported in the English literature as of January 31, 2024. Nevertheless, physicians need to be vigilant in recognizing this condition, as its progression impacts the quality of life (QOL) of affected patients. In Case 1, a 60-year-old male with a medical history of papillary RCC experienced a deterioration in visual acuity (VA) and was diagnosed with solitary choroidal metastasis. Subsequently, multiple metastases were identified, prompting the initiation of a combination therapy regimen consisting of pembrolizumab plus axitinib. Despite treatment, progression of choroidal metastasis and a further decline in VA were observed. The patient underwent stereotactic radiotherapy and experienced complete resolution of the choroidal metastasis, accompanied by a slight improvement in VA. In Case 2, a 76-year-old man presented with a renal tumor accompanied by lung metastases. He underwent nephrectomy, and the histological diagnosis was papillary RCC. We initiated combination therapy consisting of nivolumab plus cabozantinib. The patient experienced a decrease in VA during treatment. We identified extensive fine metastases scattered throughout the bilateral choroid. We administered axitinib, but the patient experienced bilateral blindness. Given the absence of established therapy for choroidal metastasis, it is crucial to maintain flexibility in treatment selection. Local or systemic approaches should be used as deemed appropriate for each individual case.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to evaluate the risk of recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, particularly in ypT2 disease in patients with urothelial carcinoma, because it is not clear if all eligible patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma should be treated with adjuvant nivolumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the radiological and clinicopathological features, including cT and ypT stages, of 197 patients who had undergone two to four cycles of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy without adjuvant chemotherapy. We stratified the risk of postoperative recurrence by these factors. RESULTS: The median observation period was 29.6 (interquartile range, 11.4-71.7) months, and disease recurrence was observed in 58 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that ypT stage (P = 0.019) and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.015) were independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence. The ypT2 group (n = 38) had significantly better recurrence-free survival than the ypT3 group (n = 41) (median recurrence-free survival: not reached vs. 13.4 months, respectively, P = 0.005). In ypT2 disease, the cT2 and ypT2 group (n = 15), which was diagnosed as cT2 preoperatively and then diagnosed as ypT2 postoperatively, had significantly better recurrence-free survival than the cT3/4 and ypT2 group (n = 23) (median recurrence-free survival: not reached vs. 63.1 months, respectively, P = 0.034). There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the ypT ≤ 1 (n = 106) and the cT2 and ypT2 groups (median recurrence-free survival: not reached in both, P = 0.962). CONCLUSION: Patients with cT2 and ypT2 stage have a relatively low risk of recurrence and thus have a lower need for adjuvant nivolumab, particularly those with ypT2.

BACKGROUND/AIM: CheckMate 214 study revealed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy showed a strong and durable effect compared to sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Most of the patients underwent previous nephrectomy before systemic treatment. We retrospectively investigated the clinical outcomes of Japanese patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy following nivolumab plus ipilimumab for aRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were treated with systemic therapy for aRCC between October 2018 and August 2021 at the Saitama Medical University International Medical Center. Ten of 61 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy after the combined immunotherapy. RESULTS: The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 24.3 and 15.9 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 50.8%; 9.8% of patients had a complete response, and the median time to objective response was 3.2 (range=1.3-19.7) months. The estimated percentage of patients who sustained an objective response at 30 months was 73.0%. Twenty-three patients (74%) in the complete or partial response (CR/PR) group, 11 patients (52%) in the stable disease (SD) group, and two patients (22%) in the progressive disease (PD) group had immune-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher, respectively. For all 10 patients, cytoreductive nephrectomy following nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment were completed safely. Three patients achieved a pathological complete response without viable cancer cells. Only two patients had residual lesions on images after deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy; the remaining patients achieved radiological CR. CONCLUSION: Cytoreductive nephrectomy after nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment could be useful in a limited number of cases, possibly resulting in curative nephrectomy due to the durable therapeutic effect of immunotherapy.