Takenao Koseki

Abstract Background This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of nutrition support team (NST) facilities for preventing central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of CLABSI as well as the presence or absence of additional medical fees for NST activity between 2019 and 2021, including the period before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently, we performed between-group comparisons of the CLABSI incidence. CLABSI rates were compared based on cumulative per 1000 catheter uses during the relevant period. Results Among 47 facilities that were registered for participation, there were 34 and 13 facilities with and without additional medical fees for NST activity (NST and non-NST groups, respectively). The CLABSI incidence rate was significantly lower in the NST group 0.96 [0.28–1.73] than in the non-NST group 1.25 [075–6.10] (p < 0.05). Before the pandemic, the NST group had a lower CLABSI rate per 1000 catheter uses than the non-NST group 2019: 0.70 [0.12–1.26] vs 2.10 [0.62–5.97]. During the pandemic, the CLABSI incidence showed no significant between-group difference 2020: 0.99 [0.51–1.61] vs 1.01 [0.80–4.16]; 2021: 1.24 [0.44–2.35] vs 1.96 [1.23–5.31]; however, the CLABSI rates in the NST group remained low. Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of CLABSI was lower in the NST group than in the non-NST group, indicating the effectiveness of NST in preventing the occurrence of CLABSI.

Background: Gabapentinoid anticonvulsants are standard treatment for neuropathic pain and are often combined with opioids for treating cancer. It is assumed that this combination may heighten somnolence and respiratory depression due to the inhibitory effects of opioids on the central nervous system. Although pregabalin, a gabapentinoid, is known to increase somnolence frequency during opioid therapy, whether mirogabalin exerts similar effects on somnolence frequency under opioid therapy remains unknown. This study examined the signals of somnolence and respiratory depression in response to pregabalin and mirogabalin use by utilizing data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database and assessed their interaction with strong opioid analgesics. Methods: Information was obtained from the JADER database from April 2004 to August 2023 via the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency website. The study focused on neuropathic pain medications, specifically "pregabalin" and "mirogabalin besilate." Adverse events were defined using preferred terms (PTs) from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 26.1. The PTs considered were "Somnolence (10041349)" and "Respiratory depression (10038678)." To investigate the effect of the combination of strong opioid analgesics with pregabalin and mirogabalin on the occurrence of somnolence, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted. Results: Signals for somnolence were detected with the use of both drugs (pregabalin: information component (IC) [95% confidence intervals (CIs)]: 2.89 [2.70 to 3.08]; mirogabalin: IC [95% CIs] 2.50 [1.85 to 3.16]). When evaluating respiratory depression, a typical and serious adverse event of opioid analgesic use, a signal was detected with pregabalin use but not with mirogabalin use (pregabalin: (IC [95% CIs] 1.28 [0.83 to 1.73]; mirogabalin: IC [95% CIs] -0.15 [-2.20 to 1.89]). Multivariable analysis indicated that the use of strong opioid analgesics increased the occurrence of somnolence when combined with pregabalin but not when combined with mirogabalin (p = 0.004). Conclusion: While the safety of concomitant administation of mirogabalin with opioids remains controversial, caution should be exercised when using pregabalin, especially in combination with opioids for neuropathic pain, compared to that for mirogabalin.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients with malignant lymphoma, in a latent state of weakened immune function, are at risk of chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Concomitant therapy with bendamustine and rituximab or obinutuzumab intensifies immunosuppression, potentially affecting CMV onset. This study aimed to assess CMV onset differences between bendamustine monotherapy and combination therapy with rituximab or obinutuzumab using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A JADER analysis dataset (April 2004 to September 2022) defined CMV infection using 31 preferred term (PT) words from MedDRA 25.1J HLT "Cytomegalovirus infection (10011827)". Reporting odds ratios (ROR) calculated CMV infection signals for bendamustine monotherapy, rituximab, obinutuzumab, bendamustine+rituximab (BR), and bendamustine+obinutuzumab (GB). ROR confidence intervals exceeding 1 indicated a CMV signal. Days of CMV infection were calculated based on adverse event onset and administration start. RESULTS: CMV signals were confirmed for monotherapy and combination therapies. CMV infection durations (median, interquartile range) were 41.0 days (23.5-69.5) for bendamustine monotherapy, 63.5 days (35.2-95.0) for BR, and 61.0 days (33.0-102.5) for GB, with cases exceeding 200 days. CONCLUSION: JADER analysis detected significant CMV signals for rituximab, obinutuzumab, and bendamustine. Caution may be warranted 7-9 months post-bendamustine administration, necessitating further investigation, including cell-mediated immunity suppression assessment.

mRNA vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have played a key role in reducing morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of EXG-5003, a two-dose, controllable self-replicating RNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. EXG-5003 encodes the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 and was administered intradermally without lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The participants were followed for 12 months. Forty healthy participants were enrolled in Cohort 1 (5 µg per dose, n = 16; placebo, n = 4) and Cohort 2 (25 µg per dose, n = 16; placebo, n = 4). No safety concerns were observed with EXG-5003 administration. SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibody titers and neutralizing antibody titers were not elevated in either cohort. Elicitation of antigen-specific cellular immunity was observed in the EXG-5003 recipients in Cohort 2. At the 12-month follow-up, participants who had received an approved mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) >1 month after receiving the second dose of EXG-5003 showed higher cellular responses compared with equivalently vaccinated participants in the placebo group. The findings suggest a priming effect of EXG-5003 on the long-term cellular immunity of approved SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.