YASUSHI MATSUDA

BACKGROUND: Despite the low number of lung transplantations (LTs) in Japan, 10 LT facilities are accredited and good outcomes have been reported. A database review was conducted to clarify the impact of case volume at LT facilities in Japan on short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: All cadaveric LT cases treated between 2000 and 2021 in Japan were analyzed using the database of the Japanese Society of Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation (JSLHT). The nine institutions represented were categorized into the low-volume (LV; <80 cumulative LT cases, <8 LTs/year, n=5) and high-volume (HV; ≥80 cumulative LT cases, ≥8 LTs/year, n=4) centers. Ninety-day and 1-year mortality, as well as 5- and 10-year survival data were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 658 cadaveric LTs were performed at the nine institutions. The 90-day rates of mortality at the HV and LV centers were 3.5% and 3.9%, respectively (P=0.801), while the 1-year mortality rates were 9.2% and 11.5%, respectively (P=0.199). Additionally, log-rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves showing case volume did not reveal a significant difference in long-term survival between the HV and LV centers (P=0.272), though the LV centers had wide differences for long-term outcomes (P=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Case volume did not have effects on short- or long-term outcomes following LT in Japan, while there were large variations in long-term outcomes among the LV centers compared to those of the HV centers.

OBJECTIVES: Standard bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) is not feasible for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) complicated with a giant pulmonary arterial aneurysm (PAA). This study aimed to describe the outcomes of BLT with pulmonary artery reconstruction (PAR) using donor aorta for such patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study reviewing PAH patients with a PAA who received BLT with PAR using donor aorta from January 2010 through December 2020. We compared the characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of recipients receiving PAR (PAR group) with those who had no PAA and received standard BLT (non-PAR group). RESULTS: Nineteen adult PAH patients underwent cadaveric lung transplantation during the study period. Among them, 5 patients with a giant PAA (median pulmonary artery trunk diameter, 69.9 mm) underwent BLT with PAR using donor aorta and the others received standard BLT. Although the operation time tended to be longer in the PAR group compared with the non-PAR group (1239 vs 958 mins, P = 0.087), 90-day mortality (PAR group: 0% vs non-PAR group: 14.3%, P > 0.99), and 5-year survival rate (PAR group: 100% vs non-PAR group: 85.7%, P = 0.74) was comparable between the groups. No dilatation, constriction or infection of the aortic grafts were recorded during the study period with a median follow-up time of 94 months in the PAR group. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation with PAR using donor aorta is a valid surgical option for PAH patients complicated with a giant PAA.

PURPOSE: To clarify the impact of donor and recipient characteristics on the survival of recipients before and after lung transplantation in the Japanese population. METHODS: Patients' data were collected for retrospective analysis from all authorized lung transplant centers in Japan. We included 1963 patients listed for lung transplantation by the end of December 2021, comprised of 658 deceased-donor and 270 living-donor lung transplants. RESULTS: Primary disease had a significant impact on the mortality of patients waiting for transplantation. The indications for transplant significantly affected the post-transplant survival rate of deceased-donor lung transplant recipients. The recipient's age also significantly affected the post-transplant survival rate of the deceased-donor and living-donor lung transplant recipients. The recipients of grafts transplanted from donors aged 61 years or older showed a worse post-transplant survival rate (≧60 years old). The survival rate for the combination of a female donor to a male recipient among the deceased-donor lung transplant recipients was the worst among the four combinations. CONCLUSION: The donor and recipient characteristics significantly impacted the survival of recipients after lung transplantation. The underlying mechanism of the negative impact of the gender mismatch of female donor to male recipient on post-transplant survival needs to be investigated further.

PURPOSE: The phase angle (PhA), calculated by bioelectrical impedance analysis, is used as a nutritional risk indicator. A low preoperative PhA has been reported as a marker of postoperative complications in patients with cancer; however, the relationship between the PhA and postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer remains unknown. We conducted this study to assess the predictive ability of the preoperative PhA for postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for primary lung cancer. METHODS: We reviewed the data on 240 patients who underwent surgery for primary lung cancer at our institution between August, 2019 and August, 2021. RESULTS: The PhA value in this study was 4.7 ± 0.7°. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, grade ≥ II postoperative complications occurred in 53 patients (22.0%). Based on the multivariate logistic analysis, only the PhA (odds ratio, 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.90, p = 0.018) was an independent predictor of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The PhA may be a valuable marker for predicting the risk of postoperative complications following lung cancer surgery.