加藤 省一

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)+ nodal T- and NK-cell lymphoma (EBV+ nPTCL) is a peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) that presents as a primary nodal disease with T-cell phenotype and EBV harboring on tumor cells. To date, the genetic aspect of EBV+ nPTCL has not been fully investigated. In this study, whole-exome and/or genome sequencing was performed on 22 cases of EBV+ nPTCL. TET2 (68%) and DNMT3A (32%) were observed to be the most frequently mutated genes whose presence was associated with poor overall survival (p = 0.004). The RHOA p.Gly17Val mutation was identified in two patients who had TET2 and/or DNMT3A mutations. In four patients with TET2/DNMT3A alterations, blood cell-rich tissues (bone marrow [BM] or spleen) were available as paired normal samples. Three out of these four cases had at least one identical TET2/DNMT3A mutation in the BM or spleen. Additionally, the whole part of the EBV genome was sequenced and structural variations (SVs) were found frequent among the EBV genomes (63%). The most frequently identified type of SV was deletion. In one patient, four pieces of human chromosome 9, including PD-L1 were identified to be tandemly incorporated into the EBV genome. The 3'-untranslated region of PD-L1 was truncated, causing a high-level of PD-L1 protein expression. Overall, the frequent TET2 and DNMT3A mutations in EBV+ nPTCL seem to be closely associated with clonal hematopoiesis and, together with the EBV genome deletions, may contribute to the pathogenesis of this intractable lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: No consensus has been reached yet concerning treatment strategies for a sequential classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) following gray zone lymphoma (GZL). Prognosis of GZL after a failed autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is poor and treatment strategy is very limited. As yet there are limited data showing clinical outcomes of brentuximab vedotin (BV) for GZL, especially for sequential CHL after GZL. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of CHL following primary refractory GZL after a failed auto-HCT and showed favorable response to first-line CHL-directed chemoradiotherapy consisting of BV plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazin (AVD) followed by irradiation. The sequential cases with an early evolution, whose diagnosis of second lymphoma was made within a year, have been recently reported very poor survival shorter than a year. Whether a sequential CHL following GZL should be treated as a primary or relapsed disease has not been clearly elucidated. Our patient showed favorable response to first-line CHL-directed chemoradiotherapy without allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and has in continuous remission for 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The management of our case could help for physicians to make better treatment decisions and provide insights for further exploration in future studies.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs), particularly nodal lymphomas of T-follicular helper cell origin, may include Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS)-like cells in their microenvironment. These HRS-like cells are morphologically indistinguishable from HRS cells of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL). Therefore, PTCLs with HRS-like cells pose a differential diagnosis vis-à-vis CHL. A previous study reported that, in contrast to HRS cells, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is rare in HRS-like cells of PTCLs and suggested that PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is useful to differentiate HRS cells and HRS-like cells. In this study, we analyzed 21 patients with PTCL with HRS-like cells and 34 patients with CHL and assessed the diagnostic utility of STAT6, pSTAT6, and pSTAT3 immunohistochemistry in distinguishing HRS cells from HRS-like cells. In addition, we also performed PD-L1 immunohistochemistry to reconfirm its utility in distinguishing the 2 diseases. Compared with HRS cells in CHLs, HRS-like cells in PTCLs showed significantly less positivity for STAT6 (9.6% vs. 70%, P <0.001), pSTAT6 (9.6% vs. 70%, P <0.001), and PD-L1 (9.6% vs. 85%, P <0.001). Thus, we reconfirmed the diagnostic utility of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in distinguishing CHLs from PTCLs with HRS-like cells. In contrast, both HRS-like and HRS cells were highly associated with pSTAT3 expression, with no significant difference in positive cell frequency (86% vs. 91%, P =0.66). On the basis of these findings, we conclude that, in addition to PD-L1, STAT6 and pSTAT6 immunohistochemistry are helpful diagnostic tools to distinguish CHLs from PTCLs with HRS-like cells.

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) was first described in 1832 by Thomas Hodgkin, and is characterized by a small number of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells in a rich inflammatory background. However, even in this modern era, due to the histological and biological overlap with CHL and other B-cell malignancies, including mediastinal grey zone lymphoma and other lymphomas accompanied by "Hodgkinoid cells", their discrimination is challenging and sometimes impossible. The complexity and ambiguity of the boundaries of CHL and its related diseases make the definition of CHL unresolved. Our group has studied the significance of PD-L1 expression and infection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in the diagnosis of CHL, emphasizing their pathological role, clinical significance, and high reproducibility even in daily clinical practice. In this review, we summarize the diagnostic strategy of CHL and its histological lookalikes based on neoplastic PD-L1 expression and infection of EBV, and attempt a reappraisal of the definition of CHL.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer with a microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient status is not common. Few reports of the response to pembrolizumab in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a real-world setting have been reported. This case report describes a dramatic response to pembrolizumab after initial pseudoprogression in a patient with microsatellite instability-high metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old man was administered pembrolizumab for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after the genetic evaluation of lymphadenectomy revealed a microsatellite instability-high status. His general condition dramatically improved after pseudoprogression. His favorable condition has been maintained for 1 year since the final dose. CONCLUSION: We experienced a case of dramatic response to pembrolizumab after pseudoprogression in a patient with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and the microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient phenotype, a few months follow-up is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab.