Tomohiro Mizuno

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is a major dose-limiting adverse event that can lead to both acute and chronic kidney injury. The formation of thiol-cisplatin conjugates within renal tubular cells has been implicated as a key mechanism underlying CIN. Flopropione is an inhibitor of cysteine conjugate β-lyase 1, an enzyme that catalyzes the formation of the thiol-cisplatin conjugate, which might prevent CIN. OBJECTIVE: We designed a clinical trial to evaluate the safety of flopropione in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy and explore its efficacy in preventing CIN. METHODS: This is a phase 1 and 2a, single-center, randomized, open-label trial conducted in patients undergoing cisplatin therapy. Participants are randomized in a 5:2 ratio per cohort to receive either flopropione or no treatment. On the day of cisplatin administration, the flopropione group receives oral flopropione twice daily (80 mg in cohort 1, 160 mg in cohort 2, and 240 mg in cohort 3). On the following day, all cohorts receive 3 doses of 80 mg of oral flopropione. A step-up dose escalation design is adopted, progressing from cohort 1 to 3 after confirming safety at each level. The primary end point is the safety of flopropione use in combination with cisplatin; the secondary end points include changes in the levels of urinary biomarkers of nephrotoxicity such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, liver-type fatty acid-binding protein, and kidney injury molecule-1. Blood and urine samples are collected within 48 hours before cisplatin administration and at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week after its initiation for safety and efficacy assessments. RESULTS: The first participant was registered in July 2024. As of January 2026, participant registration is ongoing. The final participant will complete the study by March 2026. Publication of results is expected by March 2027. CONCLUSIONS: This study is expected to contribute to advances in preventive strategies for CIN by providing evidence that inhibition of cysteine conjugate β-lyase 1 by flopropione may attenuate CIN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs041220021; https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs041220021. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/87907.

OBJECTIVES: Sivelestat sodium hydrate (SSH) may be effective in the early stage of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) before the neutrophil extracellular trap scaffold structure is complete. Therefore, patients with suppression of fibrinolysis (SF) before the secondary fibrinolytic process might benefit from SSH administration. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of the SF state and combination therapy on the effect of SSH administration. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients diagnosed with ARDS at Fujita Health University Hospital between July 2005 and December 2016. Patients with ARDS were stratified into the SF and hyperfibrinolysis (HF) groups. Using the fibrin degradation product (FDP)/D-dimer ratio, cut-off values were set as follows: FDP/D-dimer >2 for the HF group and FDP/D-dimer ≤2 for the SF group. The 28-day mortality was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: In total, 168 patients (71 in the HF group and 97 in the SF group) were included in the analysis. The mortality within 28 days was not different based on SSH administration in either group (HF group: p=0.956, SF group: p=0.957). In the SF group, the mortality rate within 28 days in SSH-treated patients who received antithrombotic drugs was significantly higher than that in patients who received SSH only (p<0.05). However, this finding was not present in the HF group (p=0.786). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of SSH and antithrombotic drugs might worsen the treatment outcome of patients with ADRS in the SF state.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) is a standard third-line therapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. The standard dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 2 days off) is associated with a high incidence of severe neutropenia. Conversely, a biweekly dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 9 days off) reportedly reduces this incidence. However, no direct comparison of these regimens has been made. In this study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of these two dosing schedules. METHODS: We analyzed data from patients who received FTD/TPI + BEV treatment between June 2016 and January 2024 at three hospitals affiliated with Fujita Health University. The effects of the dosing schedules on hematological toxicity, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 125 patients, 26 and 99 were classified into the standard and biweekly groups, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia occurred in 50.0% of patients in the standard group and 29.3% of those in the biweekly group (P = .062), with multivariable analysis confirming the dosing schedule impact (P = .048). Median TTF was 5.4 and 7.0 months, while median OS was 16.4 and 14.5 months (P = .908, 0.947) in the standard and biweekly groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The biweekly regimen of FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in a lower tendency for severe neutropenia than that in the standard regimen, while maintaining comparable OS and TTF in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer.