研究者業績

Yoshiharu Ohno

  (大野 良治)

Profile Information

Affiliation
Professor (Professor and Chairman), School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fujita Health University
Degree
MD, PhD(Mar, 1998, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine)

Contact information
yohnofujita-hu.ac.jp
ORCID ID
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-1084
J-GLOBAL ID
200901037501461104
researchmap Member ID
1000372100

Papers

 339
  • Masahiko Nomura, Takeshi Yoshikawa, Takahiro Ueda, Yoshiyuki Ozawa, Hirona Kimata, Yuya Ito, Kenji Fujii, Naruomi Akino, Daisuke Takenaka, Yoshiharu Ohno
    European Journal of Radiology, Mar, 2026  
  • Yoshiharu Ohno, Yoshiyuki Ozawa, Takahiro Ueda, Masahiko Nomura, Natsuka Yazawa, Maiko Shinohara, Kaori Yamamoto, Yuichiro Sano, Masato Ikedo, Masanori Ozaki, Masao Yui, Shohei Harada, Saki Takeda, Akiyoshi Iwase, Takeshi Yoshikawa, Daisuke Takenaka
    European Radiology, Dec 24, 2025  
  • Juergen Biederer, Mark O. Wielpuetz, Grace Parraga, Yoshiharu Ohno, Mark Schiebler, James M. Wild, Jens Vogel-Claussen, Edwin J.R. van Beek, Mitchell Albert, Tally Altes, James Gee, Jin Mo Goo, Tae Iwasawa, David G. Kiely, Toyohiro Hirai, Chang Hyun Lee, Ki Yeol Lee, David Levin, David A. Lynch, Sadayuki Murayama, Yasatuka Nakano, Mizuki Nishino, Joon Beom Seo, Jason Woods
    Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, Oct 1, 2025  
  • Yoshiharu Ohno, Yasuko Fujisawa, Takeshi Yoshikawa, Shinichiro Seki, Daisuke Takenaka, Kenji Fujii, Yuya Ito, Hirona Kimata, Naruomi Akino, Hiroyuki Nagata, Masahiko Nomura, Takahiro Ueda, Yoshiyuki Ozawa
    European Radiology, Sep 5, 2025  
  • Masahiro Yanagawa, Yukihiro Nagatani, Akinori Hata, Hiromitsu Sumikawa, Hiroshi Moriya, Shingo Iwano, Nanae Tsuchiya, Tae Iwasawa, Yoshiharu Ohno, Noriyuki Tomiyama
    Japanese journal of radiology, Jul 31, 2025  
    PURPOSE: To construct two machine learning radiomics (MLR) for invasive adenocarcinoma (IVA) prediction using normal-spatial-resolution (NSR) and high-spatial-resolution (HSR) training cohorts, and to validate models (model-NSR and -HSR) in another test cohort while comparing independent radiologists' (R1, R2) performance with and without model-HSR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, all CT images were reconstructed using NSR data (512 matrix, 0.5-mm thickness) and HSR data (2048 matrix, 0.25-mm thickness). Nodules were divided into training (n = 61 non-IVA, n = 165 IVA) and test sets (n = 36 non-IVA, n = 203 IVA). Two MLR models were developed with 18 significant factors for the NSR model and 19 significant factors for the HSR model from 172 radiomics features using random forest. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) was analyzed using DeLong's test in the test set. Accuracy (acc), sensitivity (sen), and specificity (spc) of R1 and R2 with and without model-HSR were compared using McNemar test. RESULTS: 437 patients (70 ± 9 years, 203 men) had 465 nodules (n = 368, IVA). Model-HSR AUCs were significantly higher than model-NSR in training (0.839 vs. 0.723) and test sets (0.863 vs. 0.718) (p < 0.05). R1's acc (87.2%) and sen (93.1%) with model-HSR were significantly higher than without (77.0% and 79.3%) (p < 0.0001). R2's acc (83.7%) and sen (86.7%) with model-HSR might be equal or higher than without (83.7% and 85.7%, respectively), but not significant (p > 0.50). Spc of R1 (52.8%) and R2 (66.7%) with model-HSR might be lower than without (63.9% and 72.2%, respectively), but not significant (p > 0.21). CONCLUSION: HSR-based MLR model significantly increased IVA diagnostic performance compared to NSR, supporting radiologists without compromising accuracy and sensitivity. However, this benefit came at the cost of reduced specificity, potentially increasing false positives, which may lead to unnecessary examinations or overtreatment in clinical settings.

Misc.

 638

Presentations

 800

Teaching Experience

 1

Research Projects

 22