Hisato Ishizawa, Yasushi Matsuda, Yoshiharu Ohno, Eiko Sakurai, Atsuhiko Ota, Hidekazu Hattori, Tetsuya Tsukamoto, Masaaki Matsunaga, Hiroshi Kawai, Yamato Suzuki, Hiromitsu Nagano, Takahiro Negi, Daisuke Tochii, Sachiko Tochii, Takashi Suda, Yasushi Hoshikawa
Journal of thoracic disease, 15(2) 516-528, Feb 28, 2023
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer frequently occurs in lungs with background idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). Limited resection is often selected to treat lung cancer in patients with IIPs in whom respiratory function is already compromised. However, accurate surgical margins are essential for curative resection; underestimating these margins is a risk for residual lung cancer after surgery. We aimed to investigate the findings of lung fields adjacent to cancer segments affect the estimation of tumor size on computed tomography compared with the pathological specimen. METHODS: This analytical observational study retrospectively investigated 896 patients with lung cancer operated on at Fujita Health University from January 2015 to June 2020. The definition of underestimation was a ≥10 mm difference between the radiological and pathological maximum sizes of the tumor. RESULTS: The lung tumors were in 15 honeycomb, 30 reticulated, 207 emphysematous, and 628 normal lungs. The ratio of underestimation in honeycomb lungs was 33.3% compared to 7.4% without honeycombing (P=0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that honeycombing was a significant risk factor for tumor size underestimation. A Bland-Altman plot represented wide 95% limits of agreement, -40.8 to 70.2 mm, between the pathological and radiological maximum tumor sizes in honeycomb lungs.