大高 洋平

INTRODUCTION: Dose (number of repetitions) has been suggested as a key element in the effectiveness of rehabilitation exercises to promote motor recovery of the hemiparetic upper limb. However, rehabilitation exercises tend to be monotonous and require significant motivation to continue, making it difficult to increase the exercise dose. To address this issue, gamification technology has been implemented in exercises to promote self-engagement for people with hemiparesis in continuing monotonous repetitive movements. This study aimed to investigate how subjective perspectives, specifically enjoyability, motivation to continue, and expectancy of effectiveness, change through continuous daily exercise using a developed gamified exercise system. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Ten people with stroke suffering upper limb dysfunction underwent daily gamified exercise for seven days. The gamified exercise consisted of an electromyography (EMG)-controlled operating system that enabled users to play virtual games using repetitive finger movements. The participants performed conventional self-exercise on the same day as the control exercise, and rated their subjective perspectives on both exercises on a numerical rating scale on each exercise day. RESULTS: Ratings for enjoyability and motivation to continue consistently showed significantly higher scores for the gamified exercise than for conventional self-exercise on all exercise days. A similar trend was observed in the ratings for the expectancy of effectiveness. No changes over time were found in any of the ratings throughout the exercise period. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise using the developed EMG-controlled gamified system may have the potential to maintain motivation and enjoyment in people with stroke to continue monotonous repetitive finger movements.

This study investigated the effects of ankle dorsiflexion angle adjustments in ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on the gait of healthy individuals. Fifteen healthy participants engaged in treadmill walking tasks while wearing AFOs with dorsiflexion angles set at 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15°. Three-dimensional treadmill gait analysis was used to collect data during treadmill walking. The analysis focused on toe clearance and the contribution of the vertical component of limb shortening (LS), and compared them across different dorsiflexion angles. The results indicated a significant increase in toe clearance at 10° (median [interquartile change]: 5.03 [0.90] vs. 5.98 [1.18], p < 0.01) and 15° (5.03 [0.90] vs. 5.82 [1.11], p < 0.01) dorsiflexion angle conditions compared to the 0° condition. Similarly, LS demonstrated significant increases at 10° (4.89 [1.97] vs. 5.87 [1.31], p < 0.01) and 15° (4.89 [1.97] vs. 5.61 [1.65], p < 0.01) conditions when compared with the 0° condition. These findings support the notion that higher dorsiflexion angles in AFOs lead to increased toe clearance and LS, suggesting the effectiveness of dorsiflexion angle adjustments as a strategy to address reduced toe clearance.

Background/Objectives: Clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for various pathological conditions, but the overall impact on rehabilitation practice remains unclear. We comprehensively examined and analyzed systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating rehabilitative interventions with robotic devices. Methods: Four databases were searched using term combinations of keywords related to robotic devices, rehabilitation, and SRs. The SR meta-analyses were categorized into “convincing”, “highly suggestive”, “suggestive”, “weak”, or “non-significant” depending on evidence strength and validity. Results: Overall, 62 SRs of 341 RCTs involving 14,522 participants were identified. Stroke was most frequently reported (40 SRs), followed by spinal cord injury (eight SRs), multiple sclerosis (four SRs), cerebral palsy (four SRs), Parkinson’s disease (three SRs), and neurological disease (any disease causing limited upper- and lower-limb functioning; three SRs). Furthermore, 38, 21, and 3 SRs focused on lower-limb devices, upper-limb devices, and both upper- and lower-limb devices, respectively. Quantitative synthesis of robotic intervention effects was performed by 51 of 62 SRs. Robot-assisted training was effective for various outcome measures per disease. Meta-analyses offering suggestive evidence were limited to studies on stroke. Upper-limb devices were effective for motor control and activities of daily living, and lower-limb devices for walking independence in stroke. Conclusions: Robotic devices are useful for improving impairments and disabilities in several diseases. Further high-quality SRs including RCTs with large sample sizes and meta-analyses of these RCTs, particularly on non-stroke-related diseases, are required. Further research should also ascertain which type of robotic device is the most effective for improving each specific impairment or disability.

Objective: To clarify the time-course of longitudinal changes in the independence level of subtasks composing bed–wheelchair transfer among patients with stroke.Design: Single-institution prospective cohort study.Patients: A total of 137 consecutive post-stroke patients using wheelchair on admission to the subacute rehabilitation wards.Methods: The independence degree in each of the 25 transfer-related subtasks was assessed using the Bed–Wheelchair Transfer Tasks Assessment Form on a three-level scale every two weeks, from admission to the endpoint (either discharge or when achieving independent transfer). Patients were classified based on admission and endpoint assessment form scores using two-step cluster analysis.Results: Patients were classified into three clusters. The first cluster included 50 patients who exhibited a greater independence level in all subtasks on admission (52.0–100% of patients performed each subtask independently) and at the endpoint (64.0–100%). The second included 30 patients who showed less independence on admission (0–27.8%) but achieved greater independence levels at the endpoint (44.4–97.2%). The third included 51 patients whose independence level remained low in many subtasks from admission (0–5.8%) until the endpoint (0–29.4%).Conclusion: The independence level and its changing process during transfer were categorized into three time-courses, each requiring different intervention strategies.