井澤 英夫

The renal angina index (RAI) is a validated scoring tool for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI). We investigated the efficacy of the RAI in 2436 heterogeneous patients (mean age, 70 years) treated in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs). The RAI was calculated from creatinine and patient condition scores. AKI was diagnosed by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome criteria. The primary and secondary endpoints were the development of severe AKI and all-cause mortality, respectively. Four hundred thirty-three patients developed AKI, 87 of them severe. In multivariate analyses, the RAI was a significant independent predictor of severe AKI. During the 12-month follow-up period, 210 patients suffered all-cause death. Elevated RAI was independently associated with all-cause mortality, as was NT-proBNP (p < 0.001). The RAI is a potent predictor not only of severe AKI but also of adverse outcomes and substantially improved the 12-month risk stratification of patients hospitalized in CICUs.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is known to have a high negative predictive value (NPV) in identifying coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to examine whether resting echocardiographic parameters could exclude significant CAD on CCTA. METHODS: We recruited 142 patients who had undergone both CCTA and echocardiography within a 3-month window. Based on the CCTA findings, patients were divided into two groups: Group A (non-significant CAD, defined as all coronary segments having <50% stenosis) and Group B (significant CAD). Resting echocardiographic parameters were compared between the two groups to identify predictors of non-significant CAD on CCTA. RESULTS: A total 92 patients (mean age, 68 ± 13 years; males, 62%) were eligible for this study; 50 in Group A and 42 in Group B. Among the various echo parameters, left atrial volume index (LAVI) and left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) were significantly lower in Group A (23.5 ± 7.6 vs. 33.6 ± 7.4 mL/m2 , p < .001; -20.2 ± 1.8% vs. -16.8 ± 2.0%, p < .001, respectively). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the cutoff value to exclude significant CAD on CCTA was 29.0 mL/m2 for LAVI (NPV 80.8%) and -18.1% for GLS (NPV 80.7%). The NPV increased to 95.0% when these parameters were combined (LAVI < 29.0 mL/m2 and GLS < -18.1%). CONCLUSION: The combination of resting LAVI and GLS was clinically useful in excluding significant CAD via CCTA.

The purposes of the present study were: (1) to investigate the relationship between hospital-associated functional decline (HAFD) and non-lying time and (2) to clarify the optimal cut-off value for non-lying time associated with HAFD in older patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). From January 2021 to December 2022, patients admitted to a university hospital who underwent trans-femoral TAVI were consecutively recruited. We measured short physical performance battery (SPPB) pre and post-TAVI, and non-lying time from post-operative days 3-5. HAFD was defined as at least 1 point decrease in SPPB during pre and post-TAVI. Among 75 patients (47 female, mean age of 84.5 years) enrolled, 14 patients were classified as having HAFD. Non-lying time was significantly shorter in the HAFD group than in the non-HAFD group (371 min vs. 539 min, P < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis determined an optimal cut-off value of 477 min for differentiating the patients more likely to experience HAFD (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 92%; area under the curve, 0.798). The non-lying time could be one of the associated factors of HAFD in older patients with TAVI. Non-lying time of about 480 min (8 h) during hospitalization may be an initial target for preventing HAFD.

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) followed by computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) is now commonly used for the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). CTA-verified high-risk plaque (HRP) characteristics have also been reported to be associated with a greater likelihood of adverse cardiac events but have not been used for management decisions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes based on a combination of point-of-care computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (POC-FFRCT) and the presence of HRP in CCS patients initially treated medically or with revascularization based on invasive coronary angiography findings. METHODS: CTA was performed as the initial test in 5,483 patients presenting with CCS between September 2015 and December 2020 followed by invasive coronary angiography and revascularization as necessary. POC-FFRCT assessment and HRP characterization were obtained subsequently in 745 consecutive patients. We investigated how HRP and POC-FFRCT, which were not available during the original clinical decision making, correlated with the endpoint defined as a composite of cardiac death, acute coronary syndrome, and a need for unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: Cardiac events occurred in 20 patients (2.7%) during a median follow-up of 744 days. The event rate was significantly higher in patients with POC-FFRCT <0.80 compared with POC-FFRCT ≥0.8 (5.4 vs 0.5 per 100 vessel years; log-rank P < 0.0001) and in patients with HRP compared to those without HRP (3.6 vs 0.8 per 100 vessel years; log-rank P = 0.0001). POC-FFRCT <0.80 and the presence of HRP were the independent predictors of cardiac events (HR: 16.67; 95% CI: 2.63-105.39; P = 0.002) compared with POC-FFRCT ≥0.8 and absent HRP. For the vessels with POC-FFRCT <0.80 and HRP, a significantly higher rate of adverse events was observed in patients who did not undergo revascularization compared with those revascularized (16.4 vs 1.4 per 100 vessel years; log-rank P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: POC-FFRCT <0.80 and the presence of HRP were the independent predictors of cardiac events, and revascularization of HRP lesions with abnormal POC-FFRCT was associated with a lower event rate.