Hirofumi Morimae, Takashi Maekawa, Hiroaki Tamai, Noriko Takahashi, Tsutomu Ihara, Akihiko Hori, Hiroshi Narita, Hiroshi Banno, Masayoshi Kobayashi, Kiyohito Yamamoto, Kimihiro Komori
Surgery today 42(2) 121-6 2012年1月 査読有り
PURPOSE: We conducted this study to compare the cost of open surgical repair (OR) with that of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2008, 70 patients underwent open repair and 57 patients underwent EVAR. We evaluated the total cost, including that of the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC), that of the surgical procedure, that of materials such as grafts and guide wires, and that of the anesthesia. RESULTS: The mean costs for OR versus EVAR were as follows: DPC, \632,370 versus \490,050, respectively, which was significant; anesthesia, \123,540 versus \86,220, respectively (P < 0.05); and materials, \257,770 versus \2,113,280, respectively (P < 0.05). Thus, the mean total cost was \1,825,830 versus \3,159,270 for open repair and EVAR, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: New technologies should not only be clinically effective, but also cost effective. EVAR is less invasive clinically, but the cost of endovascular prostheses and other materials remains high.