河合智之, 南 元人, 伊藤真友子, 宮村浩徳, 安江 朗, 西尾永司, 西澤春紀, 塚田和彦, 関谷隆夫, 廣田 穣, 藤井多久麿, 桐山諭和, 黒田 誠
日本産科婦人科内視鏡学会雑誌 29(1) 189-194 2013年 査読有り
We report three cases in which umbilical endometriosis developed after a laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) for uterine myoma without endometriotic lesions.<BR>Case 1: A 36-year-old, gravida 2, para 2 underwent an LSH for uterine myoma. Removal of the uterus was performed using the peeling technique with an umbilical trocar. Twelve months postoperatively, induration appeared at the umbilical region (approximately 20 mm) and the right trocar region (approximately 5 mm). Therefore, a lumpectomy was performed 18 months after the initial surgery. The pathologic diagnosis was heterotopic endometriosis. Because the umbilical tumor relapsed 27 months following surgery, Dienogest was administered; eight months later, the tumor had resolved. The umbilical tumor reappeared two months after terminating the orally administered treatment; therefore, resection of the umbilical tumor was performed 55 months after the initial surgery.<BR>Case 2: A 44-year-old gravida 3, para 2 underwent an LSH for uterine myoma. The tumor was morcellated using a morcellator, then extracted using an umbilical trocar. Approximately 19 months postoperatively, an approximately 18 mm area of induration appeared near the umbilical region; therefore, a resection was performed. The pathological diagnosis was heterotopic endometriosis.<BR>Case 3: A 45-year-old gravida 2, para 2 underwent an LSH and left salpingectomy for a uterine myoma and left paraovarian cyst. The hysterectomy involved morcellation and extraction through the umbilical region. An approximately 46 mm area of induration with hemorrhage appeared in the umbilical region 70 months postoperatively. Due to the suspicion of an umbilical tumor, a needle biopsy was performed at the site; the pathologic diagnosis was heterotopic endometriosis. She is currently receiving Dienogest treatment as an outpatient, and is being followed-up with the possibility of surgical extraction in mind.<BR>Conclusion: Although endometriosis is a common gynecological disease, umbilical endometriosis is rare. Therefore, the disease that developed in these three cases was likely due to growth of endometrial tissue in the umbilical region at the time of tissue removal.