Yoshitaka Wada, Yohei Otaka, Yuki Senju, Hiroshi Hosokawa, Takamichi Tohyama, Hirofumi Maeda, Masahiko Mukaino, Seiko Shibata, Satoshi Hirano
Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications 5 2525-2525 2022年
OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcomes of patients with lower limb amputations receiving haemodialysis and those not receiving haemodialysis. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Patients with lower limb amputation who were admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation ward between January 2018 and December 2021. METHODS: The primary outcome was the effectiveness of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) during hospitalisation in the ward. Secondary outcomes included the total and subtotal (motor/cognitive) FIM scores at discharge, gain in the total and subtotal (motor/cognitive) FIM scores, K-level at discharge, length of hospital stay in the ward, rehabilitation time, and discharge destination. Outcomes were compared between the non-haemodialysis and haemodialysis groups. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 67.0 [11.9] years; men, 20) were enrolled in this study. Among them, 11 patients underwent haemodialysis. The FIM effectiveness was significantly higher in the non-haemodialysis group than in the haemodialysis group (median [interquartile range], 0.78 [0.72 - 0.81] vs 0.65 [0.28 - 0.75], p = 0.038). The amount of rehabilitation and all secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with lower limb amputation who were receiving haemodialysis had poorer FIM effectiveness than those not receiving haemodialysis.