yamamoto satoshi

This study aimed to validate the DFS (direct fast scarlet) staining in the diagnosis of EC (eosinophilic colitis). The study included 50 patients with EC and 60 with control colons. Among the 60 control samples, 39 and 21 were collected from the ascending and descending colons, respectively. We compared the median number of eosinophils and frequency of eosinophil degranulation by HE (hematoxylin and eosin) and DFS staining between the EC and control groups. In the right hemi-colon, eosinophil count by HE was useful in distinguishing between EC and control (41.5 vs. 26.0 cells/HPF, p < 0.001), but the ideal cutoff value is 27.5 cells/HPF (high-power field). However, this method is not useful in the left hemi-colon (12.5 vs. 13.0 cells/HPF, p = 0.990). The presence of degranulation by DFS allows us to distinguish between the groups even in the left hemi-colon (58% vs. 5%, p < 0.001). DFS staining also enabled a more accurate determination of degranulation than HE. According to the current standard to diagnose EC (count by HE staining ≥20 cells/HPF), mucosal sampling from left hemi-colon is problematic since the number of eosinophils could not be increased even in EC. Determination of degranulated eosinophils by DFS may potentiate the diagnostic performance even in such conditions.

OBJECTIVES: We set out to predict whether nonsurgical treatment is likely to succeed in removing pancreatic stones in a given patient and also to determine an optimal maximal number of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) sessions for treatment of pancreatolithiasis in that patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We ascertained the number of ESWL sessions for each of 164 patients undergoing that treatment for pancreatolithiasis between 1992 and 2020. Median follow-up duration was 31 months (range, 0-239), median age was 58 years (22-83), and the male to female ratio was 5.1:1.0. Patients were divided into 2 groups based upon an optimal maximal number of ESWL sessions determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Total stone clearance was achieved in 130 of 164 patients (79%). The median number of ESWL sessions was 3 (1-61). Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined 7 to be the optimal maximal number of sessions. Complete clearance was more frequent (87%) among the 131 patients requiring 7 or fewer ESWL sessions than among the 33 undergoing more (48%, P < 0.001). Seventeen patients (52%) undergoing 8 or more sessions still had residual stones. CONCLUSIONS: If any pancreatic stones persist after 7 ESWL sessions, we recommend transition to medical or surgical treatments.

A 69-year-old woman suspected to have IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis causing bile duct stenosis was transferred from another hospital after diarrhea, eosinophilia, and eosinophilic infiltration were detected and prednisolone was prescribed. Additional biliary imaging suggested primary sclerosing cholangitis, but the IgG4 level and inferior bile duct stenosis were alleviated by steroid therapy, suggesting IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. Therefore, prednisolone was continued. Bile duct biopsy findings suggesting adenocarcinoma led to a diagnosis of pancreatoduodenectomy. The latter specimen only displayed evidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis, and prednisolone was discontinued. Intractable cholangitis necessitated left hepatectomy, after which serum alkaline phosphatase levels increased and eosinophilic colitis recurred. The reintroduction of prednisolone effectively managed the diarrhea but only temporarily reversed the alkaline phosphatase elevation. When histologic sections from resection specimens were compared, the hepatectomy specimen exhibited greater eosinophil infiltration than the earlier pancreatoduodenectomy specimen, suggesting eosinophilic cholangiopathy superimposed on primary sclerosing cholangitis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine when a coexisting pseudocyst was likely to complicate the nonsurgical treatment of pancreatolithiasis. METHODS: We treated 165 patients with pancreatolithiasis nonsurgically between 1992 and 2020, including 21 with pseudocysts. Twelve patients had a single pseudocyst less than 60 mm in diameter. Pseudocysts in the other nine patients had diameters of at least 60 mm or were multiple. The locations of pseudocysts along the length of the pancreas varied from the area with stone involvement to the pancreatic tail. We compared the outcomes in these groups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in pain relief, stone clearance, stone recurrence, or the likelihood of adverse events between pseudocyst groups or between patients with vs without pseudocysts. However, 4 of 9 patients with large or multiple pseudocysts required transition to surgical treatment (44%) compared with 13 of 144 patients with pancreatolithiasis and no pseudocyst (9.0%) (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with smaller pseudocysts typically underwent nonsurgical stone clearance successfully with few adverse events, similar to findings in patients with pancreatolithiasis and no pseudocysts. Pancreatolithiasis complicated by large or multiple pseudocysts did not cause more adverse events but was more likely to require transition to surgery compared with pancreatolithiasis without pseudocysts. In patients with large or multiple pseudocysts, early transition to surgery should be considered when nonsurgical treatment is ineffective.

BACKGROUND: Many guidelines for nonsurgical treatment of pancreatolithiasis suggest little guidance for patients with pancreatolithiasis who do not have abdominal pain. Some patients with pancreatolithiasis whom we have treated nonsurgically with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy did not have abdominal pain, and we describe one of them here. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 42-year-old man complaining of an 8-kg weight loss over 6 months was admitted to a nearby hospital, where fasting blood sugar and hemoglobin A1c values were 500 mg/dL and 11.8%. Computed tomography showed stones in the head of the pancreas and dilation of the main pancreatic duct. He was referred to our hospital to be considered for nonsurgical treatment of pancreatolithiasis. His height and weight were 160 cm and 52 kg (body mass index, 20.31). No tenderness or other abdominal findings were evident. After obtaining informed consent for nonsurgical treatment despite absence of abdominal pain, we performed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Computed tomography showed disappearance of stones from the pancreatic head. At discharge, his weight had increased to 62 kg and hemoglobin A1c was 6.8%, though antidiabetic medication has since become necessary. CONCLUSION: We believe that nonsurgical treatment of pancreatolithiasis was helpful for this patient, and could improve exocrine and endocrine function in other patients without abdominal pain.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The association between body composition parameters measured on computed tomography (CT) and severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) is conflicting because these composition parameters vary considerably by sex and age. We previously developed normative body composition data, in healthy subjects. Z-score calculated from the normative data gives age and sex adjusted body composition parameters. We studied the above association using this novel Z-score in a large cohort of patients with AP. METHODS: Between January 2014 and March 2018, patients admitted with AP and had CT scans within a week of admission, were enrolled. Body composition data including skeletal muscle (SM), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were calculated from the CT scan using deep learning automated algorithm. Then we converted the value to Z-score, and then compared the same score between mild AP, moderately severe AP and severe AP defined by revised Atlanta criteria. RESULTS: Out of 514 patients, 336 (65.4%) are mild AP, 130 (25.3%) moderately severe AP, and 48 (9.3%) severe AP. Patients with moderately severe AP had significantly lower SM-z-score than those with mild AP (1.21 vs1.73, p = 0.048) and patients with severe AP had significantly lower SAT-z-score than those with mild AP (0.70 vs.1.29, p = 0.016). VAT-z-score was not significantly different between three groups. (p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Lower SM-z-score and SAT-z-score were associated with moderately severe and severe types of AP, respectively. Future prospective studies in patients with AP using Z-scores, may define the association between body composition and severity of AP, and explain the inconsistencies reported in previous studies.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical guidelines consider abdominal pain an indication for nonsurgical treatment of pancreatolithiasis. We examined benefit from nonsurgically treating asymptomatic pancreatolithiasis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 165 patients with pancreatolithiasis who underwent nonsurgical treatment between 1992 and 2020. Symptoms were absent in 41, while 124 had abdominal pain. In the asymptomatic group, the median follow-up duration was 8 months (range, 0-166 months), and the median age was 61 years (range, 32-80 years). In patients with pain, the median follow-up duration was 43 months (range, 0-293 months), while the median age was 57 years (range, 22-80 years). The male:female ratio was 3.6:1 for asymptomatic patients and 5.9:1 for those with pain. We compared treatment outcome, stone recurrence rate, and changes in pancreatic exocrine function (bentiromide- p -aminobenzoic acid test results) between groups. RESULTS: Nonsurgical treatment for patients with asymptomatic pancreatolithiasis had a 63% stone clearance rate, lower than 84% for symptomatic pancreatolithiasis but comparable to outcomes at other institutions. Pancreatic exocrine function values during the year after treatment were mean, 52% (standard deviation, 16%) in the asymptomatic group, similar to mean, 57% (standard deviation, 17%) in the symptomatic group. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical treatment in asymptomatic pancreatolithiasis may preserve pancreatic exocrine function as well as in symptomatic pancreatolithiasis.

OBJECTIVES: While chronic pancreatitis associated with pancreatolithiasis presents with pain, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions worsen with time. We examined outcomes of nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2020, we treated pancreatolithiasis nonsurgically in 165 patients with chronic pancreatitis using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone or followed by endoscopic procedures. The mean follow-up duration was 49 months (standard deviation, 56 months) and the age was 56 years (standard deviation, 13 years). The male:female ratio was 5.1:1 (138 men, 27 women). We followed treatment results including relief of abdominal pain, stone clearance and recurrence, and pancreatic exocrine function (bentiromide-p-aminobenzoic acid testing). RESULTS: Treatment relieved pain in 117 of 124 patients (94%). The overall stone clearance was achieved in 130 of 165 patients (79%). Stones recurred during follow-up in 50 of 130 patients (38%). One fifth of recurrences were early, often involving stricture of the main pancreatic duct. After 1 year, 65% of the patients had improved or stable exocrine function. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical stone removal usually improved symptoms and preserved pancreatic exocrine function. Nonsurgical treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy followed by endoscopic treatment if needed is useful as initial management for pancreatolithiasis.

Biliary strictures caused by inflammation or fibrosis lead to jaundice and cholangitis which often make it difficult to distinguish malignant strictures. In cases when malignancy cannot be excluded, surgery is often performed. The concept of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related sclerosing cholangitis (SC) as a benign biliary stricture was recently proposed. The high prevalence of the disease in Asian countries has resulted in multiple diagnostic and treatment guidelines; however, there is need to formulate a standardized diagnostic strategy among various countries considering the utility, invasiveness, and cost-effectiveness. We evaluated accuracies of various diagnostic modalities for biliary strictures comparing pathology in the Delphi meetings which were held in Rochester, MN. The diagnostic utility for each modality was graded according to the experts, including gastroenterologists, endoscopists, radiologists, and pathologists from the United States and Japan. Diagnostic utility of 10 modalities, including serum IgG4 level, noninvasive imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related diagnostic procedures were advocated and the reasons were specified. Serum IgG4 level, noninvasive imaging, diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound and intraductal ultrasonography under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were recognized as useful modalities for the diagnosis. The information in this article will aid in the diagnosis of biliary strictures particularly for distinguishing IgG4-SC from cholangiocarcinoma and/or primary SC.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Real-time tissue elastography is a non-invasive method for measuring liver elasticity. However, there are no reports evaluating the value of real-time tissue elastography for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with sustained virological response. The aim of this study is to clarify the diagnostic performance of real-time tissue elastography in patients with sustained virological response. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 425 chronic hepatitis C patients who underwent liver biopsy: 118 patients with sustained virological response (45.8% women) and 307 patients with hepatitis C virus (51.1% women). The post-sustained virological response biopsy was performed 5.9 ± 1.8 years after the therapy. Liver fibrosis index measurements as assessed using real-time tissue elastography were performed on the same day of biopsy. RESULTS: The respective mean liver fibrosis index values for fibrosis stages F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 were 2.82 ± 0.33, 2.90 ± 0.51, 3.06 ± 0.58, 3.65 ± 0.24, and 3.83 ± 0.65, respectively, in patients with sustained virological response. The diagnostic accuracies expressed as areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves in patients with sustained virological response were 0.776 for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥F2), 0.885 for severe fibrosis (≥F3), and 0.860 for cirrhosis (F4), respectively. The optimum cut-off values liver fibrosis index were 3.14 for ≥F2, 3.24 for ≥F3, and 3.30 for F4 in patients with sustained virological response. CONCLUSION: Real-time tissue elastography is an acceptable method for predicting the severity of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus patients with sustained virological response.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a fibro-inflammatory disease of the pancreas. Early diagnosis and intervention, before CP becomes established and irreversible, are essential to improve the long-term outcomes. The world's first diagnostic criteria for early CP were proposed in Japan in 2009, but their clinical utility remains elusive. This study aimed to clarify whether patients with early CP progress to definite CP. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective study. Patients diagnosed as having early CP according to the Japanese diagnostic criteria were prospectively followed for 2 years. Clinical profiles including symptoms, drinking and smoking status, laboratory data, imaging findings and treatments were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 83 patients who completed the 2-year follow-up period, four (4.8%) patients progressed to definite CP. The diagnosis of 48 (57.8%) patients was unchanged, and that of 31 (37.3%) patients was downgraded. All the four progressive patients were male, alcohol-related, smokers (3 current and 1 ever), and continued drinking. Comparison of the clinical profiles between the progression group (n = 4) and non-progression group (n = 79) revealed that etiology (alcohol-related), smoking status and presence of acute pancreatitis episodes were associated with the progression to definite CP. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese diagnostic criteria could identify some patients before the progression to definite CP, while the majority of the patients did not progress. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000015992.

OBJECTIVE: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not generally recommended for patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) owing to the limited clinical benefits. Nonetheless, it is frequently administered in actual practice given the patients' critical condition and the lack of solid evidence showing adverse effects of antimicrobial prophylaxis. We evaluated herein an association between antimicrobial prophylaxis and invasive pancreatic candidiasis as an adverse effect in patients with SAP. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with SAP who were admitted to the study institutions (n = 44) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for the extent of pancreatic necrosis and surgical interventions for invasive pancreatic candidiasis. RESULTS: Of the 1097 patients with SAP, 850 (77.5%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis, and 21 (1.9%) had invasive pancreatic candidiasis. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, antimicrobial prophylaxis was significantly associated with the development of invasive pancreatic candidiasis (adjusted odds ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-27.6) (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis may contribute to the development of invasive pancreatic candidiasis, and therefore, the routine use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for SAP may be discouraged.

<p>Acute cholecystitis, i.e. acute inflammation of the gallbladder, is caused by gallstones in 85% to 95% of cases. The first stage in the course is edematous (stasis and dilation of lympatics). The next is necrotizing (hemorrhagic necrosis). The last is suppurative (abscess formation). Diagnosis is based on clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. Physical signs include Murphy's sign and right upper quadrant abdominal mass, pain, or tenderness. Laboratory abnormalities include nonspecific inflammatory markers such as leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein; hepatic enzymes and bilirubin may be mildly elevated. Possible sonographic findings are gallbladder enlargement, wall thickening, stone impaction, echogenic debris, sonographic Murphy's sign, fluid surrounding the gallbladder, intramural hypoechoic layer, and hypoechoic areas showing various irregular structures and Doppler signals. Contrast computed tomography is useful when diagnosis is difficult and when pericholecystic abscess or gallbladder perforation is suspected.</p>

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess prevailing treatment of pancreatolithiasis in Japan. METHODS: We surveyed clinical data from 1834 patients (1479 men and 355 women) at 125 hospitals. RESULTS: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed alone in 103 patients (5.6%), ESWL plus an endoscopic procedure in 446 (24.3%), endoscopic treatment alone in 261 (14.2%), and surgery in 167 (9.1%). Other treatments were given to 358 (19.5%), whereas 499 (27.2%) received no treatment. Symptoms were relieved in 85.7% after ESWL, 80.8% after endoscopic treatment alone, and 92.8% after surgery. Early complication rates within 3 months after ESWL, endoscopic treatment alone, and surgery were 8%, 4.5%, and 27.1%, respectively. Late complications after ESWL, endoscopic procedures alone, and surgery were 1.7%, 2.5%, and 8.2%, respectively. Symptom relief but also early and late complications were greater after surgery than after ESWL and endoscopic treatment. Among 417 patients undergoing ESWL, 61 (14.6%) required surgery, as did 32 (16%) of 200 patients treated endoscopically. Surgery was required less frequently following initial operative treatment (11/164 patients [6.7%]). Nonsurgical initial treatments were chosen more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: First-line treatment of pancreatolithiasis should be ESWL with or without endoscopy because of minimal invasiveness and fewer complications.

BACKGROUND: The Japanese severity criteria for acute pancreatitis (AP), which consist of a prognostic factor score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography grade, have been widely used in Japan. OBJECTIVE: This large multicenter retrospective study was conducted to validate the predictive value of the prognostic factor score for mortality and complications in severe AP patients in comparison to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. METHODS: Data of 1159 patients diagnosed with severe AP according to the Japanese severity criteria for AP were retrospectively collected in 44 institutions. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the prognostic factor score for predicting mortality was 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.82), whereas the AUC for the APACHE II score was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), respectively. There were no significant differences in the AUC for predicting mortality between two scoring systems. The AUCs of the prognostic factor scores for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation, the development of pancreatic infection, and severe AP according to the revised Atlanta classification were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.86), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77), and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81-0.86), respectively, which were significantly greater than the AUCs for the APACHE II score; 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83) for the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.03), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63-0.72) for the development of pancreatic infection (p = 0.02), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.82) for severe AP according to the revised Atlanta classification (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The prognostic factor score has an equivalent ability for predicting mortality compared with the APACHE II score. Regarding the ability for predicting the development of severe complications during the clinical course of AP, the prognostic factor score may be superior to the APACHE II score.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroid has been established as the standard therapy for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), but the requirement for maintenance corticosteroid therapy is controversial. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to clarify the efficacy of maintenance corticosteroid therapy in patients with AIP. DESIGN: We conducted a multicentre, tertiary setting, randomised controlled trial. After the induction of remission with the initial oral prednisolone (PSL) treatment, maintenance therapy with PSL at 5-7.5 mg/day was continued for 3 years or withdrawn at 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival over 3 years and the secondary endpoint was serious corticosteroid-related complications. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Between April 2009 and March 2012, 49 patients with AIP were randomly assigned to the maintenance therapy group (n=30) or the cessation group (n=19). Baseline characteristics were not different between the two groups. Relapses occurred within 3 years in 11 out of 19 (57.9%) patients assigned to the cessation group, and in 7 of 30 (23.3%) patients in the maintenance therapy group. The relapse rate over 3 years was significantly lower in the maintenance therapy group than that in the cessation group (p=0.011). The relapse-free survival was significantly longer in the maintenance therapy group than that in the cessation group (p=0.007). No serious corticosteroid-related complications requiring discontinuation of PSL were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance corticosteroid therapy for 3 years may decrease relapses in patients with AIP compared with those who discontinued the therapy at 26 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000001818; Results.

We retrospectively investigated the incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma among patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Based on imaging in 195 such patients, we chose surgery as initial treatment for 54, and periodic evaluation over 6 to 192 months (mean, 52) for 141. In 6 of the 141 patients observed for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (4.2%), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma developed. Further, careful monitoring for cancer occurrence in the remnant pancreas proved essential in the surgical resection group; 2 of 26 patients (7.7%) subsequently developed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the remnant pancreas, at 41 months and 137 months after surgery. Serial observation of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms by contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography therefore is critical, whether or not surgical treatment initially was performed.