asada yasuki

This study aimed to assess fetal radiation exposure in pregnant women undergoing computed tomography (CT) and rotational angiography (RA) examinations for the diagnosis of pelvic trauma. In addition, this study aimed to compare the dose distributions between the two examinations. Surface and average fetal doses were estimated during CT and RA examinations using a pregnant phantom model and real-time dosemeters. The pregnant model phantom was constructed using an anthropomorphic phantom, and a custom-made abdominal phantom was used to simulate pregnancy. The total average fetal dose received by pregnant women from both CT scans (plain, arterial and equilibrium phases) and a single RA examination was ~60 mGy. Because unnecessary repetition of radiographic examinations, such as CT or conventional 2D angiography can increase the radiation risk, the irradiation range should be limited, if necessary, to reduce overall radiation exposure.

PURPOSE: Organ dose evaluation is important for optimizing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan protocols. However, an evaluation method for various CBCT scanners is yet to be established. In this study, we developed scanner-independent conversion coefficients to estimate organ doses using appropriate peak dose (f(0)) indices. METHODS: This study included various scanners (angiography scanners and linear accelerators) and protocols for the head and body (thorax, abdomen, and pelvis) scan regions. f(0) was measured at five conventional positions (center position (f(0)c) and four peripheral positions (f(0)p) at 90° intervals) in the CT dose index (CTDI) phantom. To identify appropriate measurement positions for organ dose estimation, various f(0) indices were considered. Organ doses were measured by using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom. Thereafter, the conversion coefficients were calculated from each obtained f(0) value and organ or tissue dose using a linear fit for all scanners, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of the conversion coefficients was calculated for each organ or tissue. The f(0) index with the minimum CV value was proposed as the appropriate index. RESULTS: The appropriate f(0) index was determined as f(0)c for the body region and a maximum of four f(0)p values for the head region. Using the proposed conversion coefficients based on the appropriate f(0) index, the organ/tissue doses were well estimated with a mean error of 14.2% across all scanners and scan regions. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed scanner-independent coefficients are useful for organ dose evaluation using CBCT scanners.

Effective dose is sometimes used to compare medical radiation exposure to patients and natural radiation for providing explanations about radiation exposure to patients, but its calculation is lengthy and requires dedicated measuring devices. The purpose of this study was to identify the most suitable conversion coefficient for conversion of easily measurable dose to effective dose in posterior-anterior chest radiography, and to evaluate its accuracy by direct measurement. We constructed an examination environment using Monte Carlo simulation, and evaluated the variation in conversion coefficients from incident air kerma (IAK), entrance-surface air kerma (ESAK), and air kerma-area product (KAP) to effective dose when the irradiation field size and radiation quality were changed. Effective doses were also measured directly using thermoluminescence dosimeters and compared with the effective dose obtained from conversion coefficients. The KAP conversion coefficient most effectively suppressed the effect of irradiation field size, and was then used to set conversion coefficients for various half-value layers. The optimal conversion coefficient was 0.00023 [mSv/(mGy·cm2)] at 120 kVp (half-value layer = 5.5 mmAl). Evaluation of the direct measurements obtained with various radiation qualities revealed that the accuracy of the conversion coefficient was maintained at ≤ 11%. The proposed conversion coefficient can be easily calculated even in facilities that do not have equipment for measuring effective dose, and might enable the use of effective dose for providing explanations about radiation exposure to patients.

We aimed to verify whether the image quality of large low-contrast objects can be improved using visual model-based iterative reconstruction (VMR) while maintaining the visibility of conventional filtered back projection (FBP) and reducing radiation dose through physical and visual evaluation. A 64-row multi-slice CT system with SCENARIA View (FUJIFILM healthcare Corp. Tokyo, Japan) was used. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were physically evaluated. A low contrast object as a substitute for a liver mass was visually evaluated. In the noise measurement, STD1 showed an 18% lower noise compared to FBP. STR4 was able to reduce noise by 58% compared to FBP. The NPS of VMR was similar to those of FBP from low to high spatial frequency. The NPS of VMR reconstructions showed a similar variation with frequency as FBP reconstructions. STD1 showed the highest 10% TTF, and higher 10% TTF was observed with lower VMR level. The SNR of VMR was close to that of FBP, and higher SNR was observed with higher VMR level. In the results of the visual evaluation, there was no significant difference in visual evaluation between STD1 and FBP (p = 0.99) and between STD2 and FBP (p = 0.56). We found that the NPS of VMR images was similar to that of FBP images, and it can reduce noise and radiation dose by 25% and 50%, respectively, without decreasing the visual image quality compared to FBP.

Abstract During fetal computed tomography (CT) imaging, because of differences in the pregnancy period and scanning conditions, different doses of radiation are absorbed by the fetus. We propose a correction coefficient for determining the fetal size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) from the CT dose index (CTDI) displayed on the console at tube voltages of 80–135 kVp. The CTDIs corresponding to pregnant women and fetuses were evaluated using a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, and the ratio of these CTDIs was defined as the Fetus-factor. When the effective diameter of a fetus was approximately 10 cm, the Fetus-factor was 1.0. The estimated pregnant SSDE was multiplied by the Fetus-factor to estimate the fetal SSDE, which was compared with the fetal dose obtained by the MC simulation of the image of the fetal CT examination. The fetal dose could be estimated with an error of 31.5% in fetal examinations conducted using helical CT.

At the diagnostic reference level (DRL) related to medical radiation, DRL quantity for general radiography is the entrance surface dose (ESD). Calculation of the ESD in medical radiography requires the backscatter factor (BSF), but derivation of the BSF requires assessment of an irradiated simulation of a human body. The present study used optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters and an anthropomorphic phantom as the irradiated body, and the BSF was calculated for different half value layer (HVL)s and field sizes. The need for different BSFs for different regions was also investigated by derivationing of the BSFs for different regions. The pelvis of a RANDO phantom was irradiated under the conditions of the HVL of 2.0, 3.1, and 4.6 mmAl; tube current of 200 mA; irradiation time of 0.1 s; source surface distance of 100 cm; and field sizes of 10 × 10 cm2, 20 cm2, 30 cm2, and 40 cm2. Measurement in air was performed under the same conditions. Several threads were stretched through the air with tissue paper placed on them and the nanoDot dosimeters placed on the paper. Four dosimeters were placed, and measurement was performed 5 times under each set of conditions. The compared radiographed regions were the skull, chest, and pelvis. The BSF increased with increasing HVL size and with increasing field size. The larger the HVL, the larger the difference between field sizes of 10 × 10 cm2and 40 × 40 cm2and the larger the increase in BSF relative to the increase in field size. The BSF differed by region, from large to small in the order chest, pelvis, and skull. The results thus showed that the BSF differs by the radiographed region. Thus, it is desirable to determine the BSF in each radiographed region by investigation with an anthropomorphic phantom.

This study aimed to compare the dose and noise level of four tube voltages in abdominal computerized tomography (CT) examinations in different abdominal circumference sizes of pregnant women. Fetal radiation doses were measured with two anthropomorphic pregnant phantoms and real-time dosimeters of photoluminescence sensors using four tube voltages for abdominal CT. The noise level was measured at the abdomen of two anthropomorphic pregnant phantoms. In the large pregnant phantom, the mean fetal doses performed using 120 and 135 kV were statistically significantly lower than the lower tube voltages (P < 0.05). In the small pregnant phantom, the mean fetal dose performed by 100, 120, and 135 kV was significantly lower than the lowest tube voltage tested (P < 0.05). The ratios of the peripheral mean dose to the centric mean dose showed that the ratios of 80 kV were the highest and those for 135 kV were the lowest in both pregnant phantoms. The ratios of the peripheral mean dose to the centric mean dose decreased as the tube voltage increased. Compared with low tube voltages, high tube voltages such as 120 and 135 kV could reduce radiation doses to the fetus without compromising the image uniformity in abdominal CT examinations during pregnancy. On low tube voltage protocols, the dose near the maternal skin surface may be increased in large pregnant women because of reduced penetration of the x rays.

Organ-effective modulation (OEM) is a computed tomography scanning technique that reduces the exposure dose to organs at risk. Ultrasonography is commonly used for prenatal imaging, but its reliability is reported to be limited. Radiography and computed tomography (CT) are reliable but pose risk of radiation exposure to the pregnant woman and her fetus. Although there are many reports on the exposure dose associated with fetal CT scans, no reports exist on OEM use in fetal CT scans. We measured the basic characteristics of organ-effective modulation (X-ray output modulation angle, maximum X-ray output modulation rate, total X-ray output modulation rate, and noise modulation) and used them in a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the effect of this technique on fetal CT scans in terms of image quality and exposure dose to the pregnant woman and fetus. Using ImPACT MC software, Monte Carlo simulations of OEMON and OEMOFF were run on 8 cases involving fetal CT scans. We confirmed that the organ-effective modulation X-ray output modulation angle was 160°; the X-ray output modulation rate increased with increasing tube current; and no modulation occurred at tube currents of 80 mA or below. Our findings suggest that OEM has only a minimal effect in reducing organ exposure in pregnant women; therefore, it should be used on the anterior side (OEMON,front) to reduce the exposure dose to the fetus.

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs 2015) in Japan were first published in 2017, on the Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposures network. Medical facilities in Japan are now presumably reconsidering radiation doses at their facilities and approaching protection optimisation through the application of DRLs 2015. However, since more than 3 years have elapsed since publication, radiation doses received by patients in Japan may have diverged from DRLs 2015. We therefore undertook the present study. Based on our questionnaire survey implemented in 2017, we estimated the entrance skin dose (ESD) under general radiography fields and the mean glandular dose (MGD) under mammography, to compile a report on the doses received by patients under general radiography fields and mammography, and to propose new DRLs as replacements for DRLs 2015. Radiation doses under general radiography fields and mammography were estimated from the results of the 2017 questionnaire survey and applied to determine new DRLs at 75% values of dose distributions in general radiography fields and at 95% values of dose distributions in mammography. Among all the modes for general radiography fields and mammography, median ESD and MGD were significantly smaller with flat panel detector systems than with computed radiography systems. Comparison of the results with DRLs 2015 values showed a trend toward decreases in all imaging methods of the general radiography fields and mammography ranging from 5.0% (child chest radiography) to 31.7% (skull radiography). Moreover, responses showed that DRLs 2015 were recognised and used for comparison at many facilities. We have described the doses received by patients in general radiography fields and mammography in 2017 and proposed new DRLs as replacements for DRLs 2015. The DRLs we proposed for general radiography fields and mammography were determined to be lower than DRLs 2015 for all modes.

The aim of this study was to investigate differences in volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) values according to facility size in Japan. A questionnaire survey was sent to 3000 facilities throughout Japan. Data from each facility were collected including bed number, computed tomography (CT) scan parameters employed and the CTDIvol and/or DLP values displayed on the CT scanner during each examination. The CTDIvol and DLP for 11 adult and 6 paediatric CT examinations were surveyed. Comparison of CTDIvol and DLP values of each examination according to facility size revealed key differences in CT dose between small and large facilities. This study highlights the importance of lowering the dose of coronary artery examination with contrast agent in smaller facilities and of lowering the dose of adult and paediatric head CT without contrast agent in larger facilities. The results of this study are valid in Japan.

Presently, the scanning start angle of the X-ray tube of X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanners cannot be controlled. As a result, there is room for reducing patient dose because the peaks of the dose distributions may overlap during multiphasic CT imaging. This study investigated methods of dose reduction by performing a Monte Carlo simulation of the X-ray tube scanning start angle and locally absorbed dose in multiphasic CT imaging. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the largest decrease in the absorbed dose was seen, when the scanning start angle between the phases was±180°. Even though with present X-ray CT scanners, the scanning start angle cannot be controlled, it is possible to decrease the absorbed dose by taking the orbital synchronized scanning and scanning range into consideration. In future we hope that, we will be able to easily reduce the dose by controlling the scanning start angle.

This study sought to optimise the swallowing computed tomography (SCT) scan protocol for use with the new wide-area detector-row CT (ADCT) scanner and to estimate patient dose in terms of the organ-absorbed dose and the effective dose. The conventional ADCT (ADCTViSION) and the new ADCT (ADCTGENESIS) scanner were compared using: (1) the organ-absorbed dose and the effective dose, with a phantom study, (2) the detailed organ-absorbed doses of the neck region, using a Monte Carlo simulation and (3) a relative visual quality analysis. The effective energy differed significantly between the ADCTViSION (50 keV) and the ADCTGENESIS (57 keV). The effective doses were 2.9 and 1.9 mSv, respectively. Compared with the ADCTViSION, the absorbed dose was reduced by 34% with the ADCTGENESIS. With the ADCTGENESIS, the tube current could be reduced from 40 to 30 mA. With the optimised scan protocol, a further 25% dose reduction can be achieved.

The present study aimed to propose local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) formulated by calculating entrance surface doses for general radiography at 20 facilities of Aichi prefecture in Japan, by comparing these values with DRLs established in Japan in 2015 (DRLs 2015) and assessing radiation dose differences among facilities. X-ray outputs (half-value layer and air kerma) of each facility were measured with a non-invasive type of detector. The results were employed to formulate local DRLs based on the 75th percentiles of dose distributions. These local DRLs were lower than the DRLs 2015 for all examinations. If proposed local DRLs from other 46 prefectures can be collected, this paper can be used to benefit the next effort to draft better DRL for Japan.

The use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) is currently recommended, and dose evaluation is considered to be important for establishing a Japanese radiological protection system in radiological medicine. Children, in particular, are sensitive to radiation, and their exposure levels must be taken into account. The DRL for the entrance surface dose (ESD) used in pediatric chest X-ray examinations in Japan is 0.2 mGy. However, the bodies of infants and young children show major changes with rapidly developing organs. Thus, the possibility that organ development may also be affected by radiation exposure should be taken into account. Therefore, radiological technologists must be conservative in setting radiographic conditions for pediatric examinations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the doses used in pediatric chest X-ray examinations at our hospital and compare them with the current DRLs, considering the assumption that setting conditions individually for different ages and subject thicknesses and performing more detailed dose evaluations will help reduce radiation exposure. The study was carried out to estimate the ESDs in 163 pediatric patients who underwent frontal or lateral chest X-ray examinations at our hospital. All doses were lower than 0.2 mGy, the dose recommended in the Japanese DRLs 2015. The doses showed a strong correlation with age, but a weaker correlation with subject thickness. These results suggest that instead of considering a common DRL for all children, the DRL should be evaluated on the basis of age.

OBJECTIVE:: To propose a new set of Japanese diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) for 2017 and to verify the usefulness of Japanese DRLs (DRLs 2015) for CT, by investigating changes in the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) from 2014 to 2017. METHODS:: Detailed information on the CT scan parameters used throughout Japan were obtained by questionnaire survey. The CTDIvol and dose-length product for the 11 commonest adult and 6 commonest paediatric CT examinations were surveyed and compared with 2014 data and DRLs 2015. RESULTS:: Evaluations of adult head (helical), and abdomen and pelvis without contrast agent, paediatric chest without contrast agent, and abdomen and pelvis without contrast agent showed a slightly lower mean CTDIvol in 2017 than in 2014 (t-test, p < 0.05). The interquartile range of CTDIvol for all 2017 examinations was lower than in 2014. CONCLUSIONS:: This study verified the lower mean, 75th percentile, and interquartile range by investigating changes in the CTDIvol from 2014 to 2017. The DRLs 2015 contributed to CT radiation dose reduction. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: The widespread implementation of iterative reconstruction algorithms and low-tube voltage in CT scanners is likely to facilitate further reduction in the CT radiation dose used in Japan. Although radiological technologists may require further education on appropriate CTDIvol and DLP usage, the DRLs 2015 greatly contributed to the reduction of the CT radiation dose used in Japan.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends adaptation of the diagnostic reference levels as an indicator of optimization of protection, and diagnostic reference levels of 2015 were also published in Japan in 2015 (Japan DRLs 2015). The entrance surface dose (ESD) is evaluated to the published standard subject thickness in Japan DRLs 2015. However, the standard radiographic settings of each facility may not be a radiographic condition of the standard subject thickness of Japan DRLs 2015. We measure and record the thickness of the subject in every examination, and it can solve this problem, but it is difficult to carry out it in the actual clinical scene. In this study, we aimed to estimate the subject thickness by using chest clinical images and to calculate ESD for each radiography. We evaluated and compared with Japan DRLs 2015 using these data. The subject thickness was estimated from 200 cases of digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) image obtained by both the frontal and lateral views of the chest radiography. Also, at the same time, the radiographic settings were acquired from the information of the DICOM tag. The subject thickness was 23.60 cm on the average, and the median of the ESD was 0.104 mGy. Also, the median of the ESD at the standard subject thickness of 20 cm in Japan DRLs 2015 was 0.075 mGy. The ESD can be calculated without measuring the body thickness of the patient of every examination by using the method of this study.

Swallowing computed tomography (SCT) is a relatively new technique for the morphological and kinematic analyses of swallowing. However, no optimal scan protocols are available till date. We conducted the present SCT study to estimate the patient dose at various patient reclining positions. A RANDO phantom with a thermoluminescent dosemeter was placed on a hard Table board in a semi-reclining position at the centre and off-centre. According to predetermined scan protocols, irradiation was performed to acquire scanograms at reclining angles of 55° and 65°. The effective dose was the lowest at the centre 45° (3.8 mSv) reclining angle. Comparison between the off-centre (4.6 mSv at 55°, 6.8 mSv at 65°) and centre (4.5 mSv, 5.8 mSv) values suggested that the off-centre position is undesirable with regard to the patient dose. Accordingly, we believe that SCT methods must be revised on the basis of these factors.

We investigated changes in the entrance skin dose (ESD) and the mean glandular dose (MGD) during plain radiography or mammography in Japan from 1974 to 2014. Surveys regarding the conditions used for plain radiography and mammography were performed throughout Japan in 1974, 1979, 1989, 1993, 1997, 2001, 2003, 2007, 2011 and 2014. The anatomical regions considered were categorised as follows: skull anteroposterior (AP), lumbar AP, lumbar lateral (LAT), pelvis (AP), ankle, chest posteroanterior (PA), Guthmann (lateral pelviography for pregnant women), infant hip joint and mammography. The doses for all anatomical regions decreased from 1974 to 1993. The MGD for mammography remained low from 1993 to 2014, and the ESDs for chest (PA) radiography trended upward. After the 2000s, the use of digital imaging increased in Japan. This is the first long-term study to examine changes in ESDs and MGDs in Japan.

This study aimed to examine the relationship between fetal dose and the dose-length product, and to evaluate the impact of the number of rotations on the fetal doses and maternal effective doses using a 320-row multidetector computed tomography unit in a wide-volume mode. The radiation doses for the pregnant woman and the fetus were estimated using ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator software for scan lengths ranging from 176 to 352 mm, using a 320-row unit in a wide-volume mode and an 80-row unit in a helical scanning mode. In the 320-row unit, the fetal doses in all scan lengths ranged from 3.51 to 6.52 mGy; the maternal effective doses in all scan lengths ranged from 1.05 to 2.35 mSv. In the 80-row unit, the fetal doses in all scan lengths ranged from 2.50 to 3.30 mGy; the maternal effective doses in all scan lengths ranged from 0.83 to 1.68 mSv. The estimated conversion factors from the dose-length product (mGy・cm) to fetal doses (mGy) for the 320-row unit in wide-volume mode and the 80-row unit in helical scanning mode were 0.06 and 0.05 (cm-1 ) respectively. While using a 320-row MDCT unit in a wide-volume mode, operators must take into account the number of rotations, the beam width as automatically determined by the scanner, the placement of overlap between volumetric sections, and the ratio of overlapping volumetric sections.

Adequate dose management during computed tomography is important. In the present study, the dosimetric application software ImPACT was added to a functional calculator of the size-specific dose estimate and was part of the scan settings for the auto exposure control (AEC) technique. This study aimed to assess the practicality and accuracy of the modified ImPACT software for dose estimation. We compared the conversion factors identified by the software with the values reported by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 204, and we noted similar results. Moreover, doses were calculated with the AEC technique and a fixed-tube current of 200 mA for the chest-pelvis region. The modified ImPACT software could estimate each organ dose, which was based on the modulated tube current. The ability to perform beneficial modifications indicates the flexibility of the ImPACT software. The ImPACT software can be further modified for estimation of other doses.

We developed a k-factor-creator software (kFC) that provides the k-factor for CT examination in an arbitrary scan area. It provides the k-factor from the effective dose and dose-length product by Imaging Performance Assessment of CT scanners and CT-EXPO. To assess the reliability, we compared the kFC-evaluated k-factors with those of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 102. To confirm the utility, the effective dose determined by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) was evaluated by a phantom study and k-factor studies. In the CCTA, the effective doses were 5.28 mSv in the phantom study, 2.57 mSv (51%) in the k-factor of ICRP, and 5.26 mSv (1%) in the k-factor of the kFC. Effective doses can be determined from the kFC-evaluated k-factors in suitable scan areas. Therefore, we speculate that the flexible k-factor is useful in clinical practice, because CT examinations are performed in various scan regions.

We developed a k-factor-creator software (kFC) that provides the k-factor for CT examination in an arbitrary scan area. It provides the k-factor from the effective dose and dose-length product by Imaging Performance Assessment of CT scanners and CT-EXPO. To assess the reliability, we compared the kFC-evaluated k-factors with those of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 102. To confirm the utility, the effective dose determined by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) was evaluated by a phantom study and k-factor studies. In the CCTA, the effective doses were 5.28 mSv in the phantom study, 2.57 mSv (51%) in the k-factor of ICRP, and 5.26 mSv (1%) in the k-factor of the kFC. Effective doses can be determined from the kFC-evaluated k-factors in suitable scan areas. Therefore, we speculate that the flexible k-factor is useful in clinical practice, because CT examinations are performed in various scan regions.

Recently, region-setting computed tomography (CT) has been studied as a region of interest imaging method. This technique can strongly reduce the radiation dose by limiting the irradiation field. Although mathematical studies have been performed for reduction of the truncation artifact, no experimental studies have been performed so far. In this study, we developed a three-dimensional region-setting CT system and evaluated its imaging properties. As an experimental system, we developed an X-ray CT system with multileaf collimators. In this system, truncated projection data can be captured by limiting of the radiation field. In addition, a truncated projection data correction was performed. Finally, image reconstruction was performed by use of the Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm. In the experiments, the line profiles and the image quality of the reconstructed images were evaluated. The results suggested that the image quality of the proposed method is comparable to that of the original method. Furthermore, we confirmed that the radiation dose was reduced when this system was used. These results indicate that a 3D region-setting CT system using 6-channel multileaf collimators can reduce the radiation dose without in causing a degradation of image quality.

The first diagnostic reference levels (DRLs 2015) in Japan were published in June 2015. The purpose of this study was to compare the calculated entrance surface doses with the values of DRLs 2015, and evaluate differences in patient exposure among facilities. Semiconductor dosimeter was installed, and dosimetry was performed using equipment and radiographic condition of each facility. As a result, a dose higher than the value of DRLs 2015 was used in 12 kinds of examination. In child chest examination, the doses of the three facilities (0.26 mGy, 0.28 mGy, 0.60 mGy) exceeded the value of DRLs 2015 (0.2 mGy). Review of the radiographic condition is necessary because the doses exceeding DRLs 2015 tended to have a high current time product. The examination with the largest difference between facilities was the lateral of thoracic spine, with a difference of about 46 times, and the examination with the smallest difference was the ankle joint, with a difference of about three times. When reviewing, it is necessary to focus mainly on examinations that have a large difference between facilities. In the future, it can be said that it is necessary to set diagnostic reference range (DRR) or achievable dose (AD) to understand how high or low dose of the own facility are compared with facilities nationwide.

一般撮影領域では、DRLs2015のDRL量は入射表面線量である。X線管焦点から検出器までの距離FCDのX線ビーム中心軸上におけるX線出力Kairを測定し、距離の逆2乗則によりX線管焦点からX線入射点までの距離FSDにおける入射表面空気カーマKESに換算し、さらに後方散乱係数BSFを乗じて入射表面線量DESを求める。(著者抄録)

The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography angiography (CTA), prospective CTA, continuous CTA/cardiac function analysis (CFA), and CTA/CFA modulation. Accordingly, we clarified the CT dose index (CTDI) to determine the relationship between heart rate (HR) and X-ray exposure. As a secondary objective, we compared radiation doses using modified ImPACT, a whole-body dosimetry phantom study, and the k-factor method to verify the validity of the dose results obtained with modified ImPACT. The effective dose determined for the reference person (4.66 mSv at 60 beats per minute (bpm) and 33.43 mSv at 90bpm) were approximately 10% less than those determined for the phantom study (5.28 mSv and 36.68 mSv). The effective doses according to the k-factor (0.014 mSv•mGy-1•cm-1; 2.57 mSv and 17.10 mSv) were significantly lower than those obtained with the other two methods. In the present study, we have shown that ImPACT, when modified for cardiac applications, can assess both absorbed and effective doses. The results of our dose comparison indicate that modified ImPACT dose assessment is a promising and practical method for evaluating coronary CTA.

With the objective of reducing patient exposure to radiation, we conducted a questionnaire survey regarding radiographic conditions in 2014. Here we report estimates of dose exposure in general radiography and mammography through an investigation and comparison of present patient exposure conditions. Questionnaires were sent to 3000 facilities nationwide in Japan. Surveys asked questions on a total of 16 items related to general radiography, including the chest, abdomen, and breast. Output data from x-ray tubes measured in the Chubu area of Japan were used as the mean in these estimates. The index of patient exposure was adopted as the entrance skin dose (ESD) for general radiography and as the mean glandular dose (MGD) for mammography. The response rate for this survey was 21.9%. Our results showed that doses received through the use of flat-panel detector (FPD) devices were lower than those received through computed radiography devices, except for the ankle joint (e.g. in chest examination, the dose from FPD and CR was 0.24 mGy, 0.31 mGy on the average, respectively). These results suggest that more widespread use of FPD devices could lead to decreases in the ESD and MGD, thereby reducing patient exposure.

To obtain patient entrance surface dose in X-ray photography, a calculation method based on measured exposure or air kerma radiated from X-ray tube is generally used. Two factors are necessary for this calculation: (1) exposure/air kerma to absorb dose conversion factor and (2) back-scatter factor (BSF) based on X-ray quality and on field size. These BSFs are commonly obtained by interpolation from existent data which were given for a water phantom whose entrance surface is flat. Since patient's surface in X-ray photograph is not flat, some error may occur when existent BSF is used in this calculation. In this article, BSF for water phantom with cylindrical surface and elliptic cylinder surface were calculated by means of the Monte Carlo simulation. And these BSFs were compared with BSF for flat surface phantom. As a result (1) radius of curvature of cylindrical phantom or horizontal axis of elliptic cylinder phantom is smaller, (2) half value layer of X-ray is larger, (3) field size is larger, difference of these BSF with that for flat surface phantom tends to be larger. Maximum difference by calculation condition assumed in this article was more than 10%. The cause of this difference is because scattering volume in irradiated body of cylindrical or elliptic cylinder phantom is smaller than flat surface phantom. To obtain patient entrance surface dose more precisely, it is necessary to use BSF respectively calculated for phantom resembling patient's body such as cylindrical or elliptic cylinder phantom by means of the Monte Carlo simulation.

Currently, the glandular dose is evaluated quantitatively on the basis of the measured data using phantom, and not in a dose based on the mammary gland structure of an individual patient. However, mammary gland structures of the patients are different from each other and mammary gland dose of an individual patient cannot be obtained by the existing methods. In this study, we present an automated estimation method of mammary gland dose by means of mammary structure which is measured automatically using mammogram. In this method, mammary gland structure is extracted by Gabor filter; mammary region is segmented by the automated thresholding. For the evaluation, mammograms of 100 patients diagnosed with category 1 were collected. Using these mammograms we compared the mammary gland ratio measured by proposed method and visual evaluation. As a result, 78% of the total cases were matched. Furthermore, the mammary gland ratio and average glandular dose among the patients with same breast thickness was matched well. These results show that the proposed method may be useful for the estimation of average glandular dose for the individual patients.

近年、CTの被曝低減技術のひとつとして領域設定型CTがある。本技術は、投影データ収集時にX線照射範囲を制限することによって関心領域のみの断層像を取得するものであり、原理的に関心領域外部の被曝を低減することが可能である。現在、本手法に関して画像再構成手法の検討等が行われているが、シミュレーションなど擬似的な環境での検証しか行われていない。そこで、本研究ではより実践的な検討を行うために実験装置を開発し、その基礎的な評価を行った。実験装置は小型のCTスキャナに2軸のアクティブコリメータを追加し、投影角ごとに照射野形状を変化させることで関心領域に限定した投影データを収集する。収集した投影データに対し補正処理を施し、FBP法を用いて画像再構成することで断層像を取得する。検証の結果、領域設定を行っても通常スキャンと同等の画質が得られ、被曝線量は通常スキャンに比べ大幅に低減することが明らかとなった。(著者抄録)

This study aimed to estimate breast glandularity in Japanese women using patient exposure conditions and tissue-equivalent materials by a conventional method. Typical glandularities in Japanese women were compared with those in European women to verify the validity of the average glandular dose estimation manual based on the EUREF protocol. Glandularity was estimated from the data of 600 patients and the model breast of the tissue-equivalent materials which had various amounts of glandular contents and thicknesses. The model breasts were measured to examine the relationships between the thickness of the glandular contents and tube loading by using an automatic exposure control system. Then, equations were established to determine glandularity from patient data. The mean glandularity in the highest compressed breast thickness (CBT) group of 36-45 mm was 72%. The mean CBT of the 184 (31%) patients with glandularities exceeding 100% was 31 mm. Glandularities in patients with CBT of 30-70 mm in the present study were higher compared to those in European women by approximately 10-20%. The results suggest that the model breast of European women might not be a suitable reference standard for more than 30% of Japanese women, who have breasts with lower CBT.

The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography angiography (CTA), prospective CTA, continuous CTA/cardiac function analysis (CFA), and CTA/CFA modulation. Accordingly, we clarified the CT dose index (CTDI) to determine the relationship between heart rate (HR) and X-ray exposure. As a secondary objective, we compared radiation doses using modified ImPACT, a whole-body dosimetry phantom study, and the k-factor method to verify the validity of the dose results obtained with modified ImPACT. The effective dose determined for the reference person (4.66 mSv at 60 beats per minute (bpm) and 33.43 mSv at 90 bpm) were approximately 10% less than those determined for the phantom study (5.28 mSv and 36.68 mSv). The effective doses according to the k-factor (0.014 mSv center dot mGy(-1)center dot cm(-1); 2.57 mSv and 17.10 mSv) were significantly lower than those obtained with the other two methods. In the present study, we have shown that ImPACT, when modified for cardiac applications, can assess both absorbed and effective doses. The results of our dose comparison indicate that modified ImPACT dose assessment is a promising and practical method for evaluating coronary CTA.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to estimate the effective radiation doses from CT examinations of both adults and children in Japan and to study the impact of various scan parameters on the effective doses. METHODS: A questionnaire, which contained detailed questions on the CT scan parameters employed, was distributed to 3000 facilities throughout Japan. For each scanner protocol, the effective doses for head (non-helical and helical), chest and upper abdomen acquisitions were estimated using ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator software v. 1.0.4 (St George's Hospital, London, UK). RESULTS: The mean effective doses for chest and abdominal examinations using 80-110 kV were significantly lower than those using 120 kV. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean effective doses for head scans between facilities employing 80-110 kV and 120 kV. In chest and abdominal examinations, the mean effective doses using CT scanners from Western manufacturers [Siemens (Forchheim, Germany), Philips (Eindhoven, Netherlands) and GE Medical Systems (Milwaukee, WI)] were significantly lower than those of examinations using Japanese scanners [Hitachi (Kashiwa, Japan) and Toshiba (Otawara, Tochigi, Japan)], except for in paediatric chest examinations. CONCLUSION: The mean effective doses for adult head, chest and abdominal CT examinations were 2.9, 7.7 and 10.0 mSv, respectively, whereas the corresponding mean effective doses for paediatric examinations were 2.6, 7.1 and 7.7 mSv, respectively. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Facilities using CT scanners by Western manufacturers commonly adopt low-tube-voltage techniques, and low-tube-voltage CT may be useful for reducing the radiation doses to the patients, particularly for the body region.

The relationship between heart rate (HR) and computed tomography dose index (CTDI) was evaluated using an electrocardiogram (ECG) gate scan for scan applications such as prospective triggering, Ca scoring, target computed tomography angiography (CTA), prospective CTA and retrospective gating, continuous CTA/CFA (cardiac functional analysis) and CTA/CFA modulation. Even in the case of a volume scan, doses for the multiple scan average dose were similar to those for CTDI. Moreover, it was found that the ECG gate scan yields significantly different doses. When selecting the optimum scan, the doses were dependent on many factors such as HR, scan rotation time, active time, prespecified cardiac phase and modulation rate. Therefore, it is necessary to take these results into consideration when selecting the scanning parameters.

近年、CTの被ばく低減技術のひとつとして領域設定型CTがある。本技術は、投影データ収集時にX線照射範囲を制限することによって関心領域のみの断層像を取得するものであり、原理的に関心領域外部の被ばくを低減することが可能である。現在、本手法に関して画像再構成手法の検討等が行われているが、シミュレーションなど擬似的な環境での検証しか行われていない。そこで、本研究ではより実践的な検討を行うために実験装置を開発し、その基礎的な評価を行った。実験装置は小型のCTスキャナに2軸のアクティブコリメータを追加し、投影角毎に照射野形状を変化させることで関心領域に限定した投影データを収集する。収集した投影データに対し補正処理を施し、FBP法を用いて画像再構成することで断層像を取得する。検証の結果、領域設定を行っても通常スキャンと同等の画質が得られ、被ばく線量は通常スキャンに比べ大幅に低減することが明らかとなった。(著者抄録)

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for mammography have yet to be created in Japan. A national questionnaire investigation into radiographic conditions in Japan was carried out for the purpose of creating DRLs. Items investigated included the following: tube voltage; tube current; current-time product; source-image distance; craniocaudal view; automatic exposure control (AEC) settings; name of mammography unit; image receptor system (computed radiography (CR), flat panel detector (FPD), or film/screen (F/S)); and supported or unsupported monitor diagnosis (including monitor resolution). Estimation of the mean glandular dose (MGD) for mammography was performed and compared with previous investigations. The MGD was 1.58(0.48) mGy, which did not significantly differ from a 2007 investigation. In relation to image receptors, although no difference in average MGD values was observed between CR and FPD systems, F/S systems had a significantly decreased value compared to both CR and FPDs. Concerning digital systems (FPDs), the MGD value of the direct conversion system was significantly higher than the indirect conversion system. No significant difference in MGD value was evident concerning type of monitor diagnosis for either the CR or the FPD digital systems; however, hard copies were used more often in CR. No significant difference in the MGD value was found in relation to monitor resolution. This report suggests ways to lower the doses patients undergoing mammography receive in Japan, and serves as reference data for 4.2 cm compressed breast tissue of 50% composition DRLs. Furthermore, our findings suggest that further optimisation of FPD settings can promote a reduction in the MGD value.