守瀬 善一

© 2019, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was introduced in the early 1990s, initially for partial resection of the anterolateral segments, from where it has expanded in a stepwise fashion. Movement restriction makes bleeding control demanding. Managing pneumoperitoneum pressure with inflow control can inhibit venous bleeding and create a dry surgical field for easier hemostasis. Since the lack of overview leads to disorientation, simulation and navigation with imaging studies have become important. Improved direct access to the liver inside the rib cage can be obtained in LLR, reducing destruction of the associated structures and decreasing the risk of refractory ascites and liver failure, especially in patients with a cirrhotic liver. Although LLR can be performed as bridging therapy to transplantation for severe cirrhosis, its impact on expanding the indications of liver resection (LR) and the consequent survival benefits must be evaluated. For repeat LR, LLR is advantageous by producing fewer adhesions and reducing the need for adhesiolysis. The laparoscopic approach facilitates better access in a small operative field between adhesions. Further evaluations are needed for repeat anatomical resection, since alterations of the anatomy and surrounding scars and adhesions of major vessels have a larger impact.

Intestinal metastases from colorectal cancer typically occur by intraperitoneal spread, whereas those occurring via hematogenous route are exceedingly rare. We report a case of intestinal metastases from sigmoid colon cancer that presented as iliopsoas abscess and ileus. A 78-year-old man who had undergone sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer 5 years ago was referred to our hospital with recurrent ileus and fever. Abdominal computed tomography showed a left iliopsoas abscess and a mass near the abscess that had ostensibly caused ileus. The patient underwent segmental resection of the jejunum including the mass. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma proliferating mainly in the submucosal and muscular layers, which was pathologically identical to the colon cancer resected 5 years ago. He died 18 months after the surgery because of liver metastases. This case report highlights the delayed occurrence of colorectal metastases at unusual sites, such as the small bowel, more than 5 years after the resection of the primary cancer. Intestinal metastases should be considered in patients with a history of colon cancer, particularly in those with recurrent ileus or abdominal abscess with no obvious cause.

© 2018 Sato et al. Objective: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) are the most common colorectal cancer markers. We aimed to identify the appropriate clinical conditions for measuring serum CEA and CA19-9 levels before surgery and during follow-up. Methods: This study included 1275 colorectal cancer patients who were divided into 3 groups according to preoperative CEA levels (group A, ≤5 ng/mL; group B, >5–≤11 ng/mL; group C, >11 ng/mL). Each group was subdivided into 2 groups according to preoperative CA19-9 levels (cutoff level: ≤37 U/mL). Recurrence and survival rates were analyzed. Results: Recurrence rate, disease-free survival after curative surgery, and prognosis were significantly worse in group A and B patients with high CA19-9 levels. At recurrence, CEA levels showed a greater increase in group B and C patients; CA19-9 levels increased in group A patients with high CA19-9 levels. At recurrence, high serum CA19-9 levels were observed in group A patients with high preoperative serum CA19-9 levels, even if the serum CEA level did not increase. Preoperative CA19-9 levels could predict recurrence and prognosis in groups A and B. Conclusion: Periodic CA19-9 determination is useful for monitoring recurrence among group A patients with high CA19-9 levels.

Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS), which combines the concepts of oncologic and plastic surgery, is becoming more common worldwide. We report the results of OBS in a Japanese patient with early breast cancer located on the outer lower quadrant area. We performed OBS combining partial mastectomy with immediate breast reshaping using multiple adipofascial cutaneous flaps and free dermal fat graft because she refused any other OBS. We selected three local flaps to repair the defect. Perioperative and postoperative complications were not seen. The cosmetic findings 3 years after surgery were not excellent, but the patient was satisfied with the results. OBS combining partial mastectomy with immediate breast reshaping using a combination of several flaps was successfully performed in a patient with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) prolongs survival in up to 40% of people, recurrence rates approach 70%. We used a multidisciplinary approach to treat recurrent liver metastases, including chemotherapy, surgery, and palliative care. On the other hand, development of chemotherapeutic agents is remarkable and improves long-term survival. However, whether chemotherapy and repeat hepatectomy combination therapy improve survival or not is still unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of repeat hepatectomy with systemic chemotherapy for mCRC. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, we reviewed the records of all patients who underwent hepatectomy for mCRC between 1974 and 2015 at Fujita Health University Hospital. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate overall survival from the first and last hepatectomy in multi hepatectomy cases after 2005 and compared outcomes between groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 426 liver resections were performed for mCRC; of these, 236 cases were performed after 2005 (late group). In 118 (50%) cases, the site of recurrence was the liver, 59 (50%) underwent repeat hepatectomy, and 14 cases had ≥ 2 repeat hepatectomies. Overall survival (OS) before and after 2005 was 42.2 and 64.1 months, respectively, with the late group having better OS compared to the early (1974-2004) group. OS for single hepatectomy cases was 83.2 months, for two hepatectomies was 42.9 months, and for three hepatectomies was 35.3 months. In total, 59 patients did not undergo surgery after recurrence with an OS of 28.7 months. Mortality of the second and third repeat hepatectomy was 1.7% and 15.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Repeat hepatectomy with systemic chemotherapy for mCRC is feasible and might achieve improved survival in carefully selected patients.

OBJECTIVES: The correlations of the ratio of long-/short-chain DNA fragments in blood with the existence of cancer and the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer (CRC) were examined. The potential use of this ratio for diagnostic screening was evaluated. METHODS: DNA concentrations were amplified using Alu247 for long-chain DNA fragments and Alu115 for long- and short-chain DNA fragments. The Alu247/115 ratio was calculated for 60 patients with CRC and 24 healthy volunteers. The correlation of the Alu247/115 ratio with clinicopathological variables and the efficacy of this ratio as a tumor marker were examined. The Alu247/115 ratio cut-off value was set using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The Alu247/115 ratio was significantly higher in patients with CRC than in healthy volunteers (P<0.001). The Alu247/115 ratio was also significantly higher in patients with Dukes stage A or B CRC than in healthy volunteers (P=0.034) as well as in patients with Dukes C or D CRC than in those with Dukes A or B CRC (P=0.016). Among patients with CRC, the Alu247/115 ratio was significantly higher in those with than without venous invasion (P=0.031). Using the cut-off value set from the ROC curve, the sensitivity of the Alu247/115 ratio was significantly higher than that of the carcinoembryonic antigen level (P=0.004) or the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the Alu247/115 ratio is a promising tool for highly sensitive and early detection of CRC.

膵外分泌機能の低下した慢性膵炎患者24例にパンクレリパーゼ1,800mgを4週間投与し、血清アルブミン値、栄養評価項目、膵酵素、便の異常、疼痛、消化不良症状の変化を検討した。平均年齢は64±15.4歳、男女比は7:1、成因はアルコール性12例、特発性11例、その他1例で、早期慢性膵炎3例を含んでいた。血清アルブミン値は4.05±0.52から4.13±0.38g/dLと有意差を認めなかった。BMIは20.4±2.9から20.7±2.6(p=0.035)と有意に増加した。総コレステロールは177.3±46.9から190.1±42.3mg/dLと増加する傾向を認めた。腹痛(VAS)は9.0±17.9から2.8±6.1と有意に減少した(p=0.017)。早期慢性膵炎3例は全例で腹痛が消失した。パンクレリパーゼは慢性膵炎患者の栄養改善に有効で慢性膵炎、特に早期慢性膵炎の腹痛に対して有効である。(著者抄録)

© The Author(s) 2018. Liver resection (LR) is now actively applied to intrahepatic recurrence of liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although indications of laparoscopic LR (LLR) have been expanded, there are increased risks of intraoperative complications and conversion in repeat LLR. Controversy still exists for the indication. There are 16 reports of small series to date. These studies generally reported that repeat LLR has better short-term outcomes than open (reduced bleedings, less or similar morbidity and shorter hospital stay) without compromising the long-term outcomes. The fact that complete adhesiolysis can be avoided in repeat LLR is also reported. In the comparison of previous procedures, it is reported that the operation time for repeat LLR was shorter for the patients previously treated with LLR than open. Furthermore, it is speculated that LLR for minor repeat LR of cirrhotic liver can be minimized the deterioration of liver function by LR. However, further experience and evaluation of anatomical resection or resections exposing major vessels as repeat LLR, especially after previous anatomical resection, are needed. There should be a chance to prolong the overall survival of the patients by using LLR as a powerful local therapy which can be applied repeatedly with minimal deterioration of liver function.

© Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. All rights reserved. Liver resection (LR), liver transplantation (LT), transarterial chemoembolization, and local ablation therapy are the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although LR, LT and local ablation therapy (only for small tumor) provide the best hope for cure, most patients with HCC have also chronic liver disease (CLD) backgrounds, including HCV-liver cirrhosis. Therefore, they are at high risk for development of postoperative complications—sometimes fatal—and metachronous multicentric recurrent tumors occurring from the preneoplastic CLD background. Appropriate treatment is selected for HCC patients, on the combined evaluations of tumor condition and liver function. However, not small number of patients cannot undergo any treatment option due to poor liver function and/or complicated tumor condition. After repeated treatments, it can happen more often. It is thought that the features of laparoscopic LR could lead to the expansion of the LR indication to those patients, in the settings of severe CLD, repeat LR and bridging to LT. In our experience, Child-Pugh (CP) score is one of the promising candidates as a selection indicator which correlates well to our indication criteria of surface small laparoscopic LR to severe CLD patients, patient’s performance status, and prognosis. Portal hypertension should be also counted in the selection criteria.

A case of colouterine fistula caused by colonic diverticulitis that was successfully treated laparoscopically is presented. A 74-year-old woman visited us with lower abdominal discomfort and vaginal excretion with minor fecal contamination. Mild tenderness was observed in her lower abdomen. Blood examinations revealed elevated white blood cell count and C-reactive protein. Sigmoid colon diverticulitis was revealed on CT, and her condition was diagnosed as colouterine fistula. Hinchey classification was stage I. After 2 weeks of conservative therapy, her symptoms were reduced, and the white blood cell count and C-reactive protein level decreased. However, fecal contaminated vaginal excretion continued. The patient underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy combined with uterus excision, and she has been in good health for the 3 years since the operation. Although colouterine fistula is usually treated with open surgery, patients with controlled and well-localized inflammation may be good candidates for a laparoscopic approach.

To investigate the difference in results according to the mode of levodopa administration and the effect of zonisamide (ZNS), we analyzed the mRNA expression of dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic receptors in the striatum of Parkinson model rats in relation to the development of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). Unilateral Parkinson model rats were subdivided into 4 groups and treated as follows: no medication (group N), continuous levodopa infusion (group C), intermittent levodopa injection (group I), and intermittent levodopa and ZNS injection (group Z). Two weeks after the treatment, LID was observed in group I and Z, but less severe in group Z. The level of both D1 and D2 receptor mRNAs was elevated in groups I and Z, but only D2 receptor mRNA expression was elevated in group C. Adenosine A2A receptor mRNA showed increased expression only in group I. The level of endocannabinoid CB1 receptor mRNA was elevated in groups N, C, and I, but not in group Z. Intermittent injection of levodopa caused LID, in association with elevated expression of D1 and A2A receptors. ZNS ameliorated the development of LID and inhibited up-regulation of A2A and CB1 receptors. Modulation of these receptors may lead to therapeutic approaches for dyskinesia.

The beginnings of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) were at the start of the 1990s, with the initial reports being published in 1991 and 1992. These were followed by reports of left lateral sectionectomy in 1996. In the years following, the procedures of LLR were expanded to hemi-hepatectomy, sectionectomy, segmentectomy and partial resection of posterosuperior segments, as well as the parenchymal preserving limited anatomical resection and modified anatomical (extended and/or combining limited) resection procedures. This expanded range of LLR procedures, mimicking the expansion of open liver resection in the past, was related to advances in both technology (instrumentation) and technical skill with conceptual changes. During this period of remarkable development, two international consensus conferences were held (2008 in Louisville, KY, United States, and 2014 in Morioka, Japan), providing up-to-date summarizations of the status and perspective of LLR. The advantages of LLR have become clear, and include reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, and - especially for cirrhotic patients-lower incidence of complications (e.g., postoperative ascites and liver failure). In this paper, we review and discuss the developments of LLR in operative procedures (extent and style of liver resections) during the first quarter century since its inception, from the aspect of relationships with technological/technical developments with conceptual changes.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the treatment outcomes after curative surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer to develop outcome-based follow-up protocols and treatment strategies. METHODS: This study was a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in patients who underwent R0 surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 1133 patients, of whom 837 had recurrence, were included in this study. Recurrence occurred within 12 and 24 months after R0 surgery in 452 (54.0 %) and 652 (77.9 %) patients, respectively. Surgical resection was performed less frequently for recurrence within 12 months of R0 surgery than for recurrence after more than 12 months (p = 0.003). Prognosis was significantly better in patients who had recurrence more than 24 months after R0 surgery than in those who had recurrence within 24 months; this was not only for all patients but also specifically for patients with resection for recurrent disease. Recurrence was less frequent in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy than in patients who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.04). Of significance, fewer patients who received preoperative chemotherapy (57.5 %) had recurrence within 24 months compared with patients who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy (79.8 %) (p = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive follow-up for at least 24 months was considered appropriate for monitoring disease recurrence after R0 surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer. In addition, preoperative chemotherapy contributed to improved outcomes.

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for tumors in the posterosuperior liver [segment (S) 7 and deep S6] is a challenging clinical procedure. This area is located in the bottom of the small subphrenic space (rib cage), with the large and heavy right liver on it when the patient is in the supine position. Thus, LLR of this area is technically demanding because of the handling of the right liver which is necessary to obtain a fine surgical view, secure hemostasis and conduct the resection so as to achieve an appropriate surgical margin in the cage. Handling of the right liver may be performed by the hand-assisted approach, robotic liver resection or by using spacers, such as a sterile glove pouch. In addition, the operative field of posterosuperior resection is in the deep bottom area of the subphrenic cage, with the liver S6 obstructing the laparoscopic caudal view of lesions. The use of intercostal ports facilitates the direct lateral approach into the cage and to the target area, with the combination of mobilization of the liver. Postural changes during the LLR procedure have also been reported to facilitate the LLR for this area, such as left lateral positioning for posterior sectionectomy and semi-prone positioning for tumors in the posterosuperior segments. In our hospital, LLR procedures for posterosuperior tumors are performed via the caudal approach with postural changes. The left lateral position is used for posterior sectionectomy and the semi-prone position is used for S7 segmentectomy and partial resections of S7 and deep S6 without combined intercostal ports insertion. Although the movement of instruments is restricted in the caudal approach, compared to the lateral approach, port placement in the para-vertebra area makes the manipulation feasible and stable, with minimum damage to the environment around the liver.

症例は70歳男性で、C型肝炎ウイルス関連肝硬変で、肝区域6病変の治療のため入院となった。CTでは、亜区域6aと6cの門脈の間の肝区域6の深部域に低密度病変が認められた。中等度硬変肝における早期肝細胞癌と診断し、亜区域6aと6cの腹腔鏡下小解剖学的肝切除を行った。胆嚢摘出後、右後Glissonian枝を門部域で曝露して切除し、Rouviere溝の肝実質を開口した。前後枝の二分枝から分岐した区域5の小Glissonian枝を保存した。二分枝から2cm遠位の後枝で後主幹部から分岐した6a枝を認識し、取り囲み、分離した。背側枝から分岐した6c枝を取り囲んで分離し、6b枝は温存した。6aと6c枝の分離後、肝細胞癌を含む区域が虚血性であることを確認した。区域の形状は術前CTシミュレーションと合致し、腹腔鏡下で切除した。病理学的検査で、高分化型肝細胞癌であることが示された。経過は順調で、術後26ヵ月時点で再発はみられなかった。

Liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is associated with high risks of developing significant postoperative complications and multicentric metachronous lesions, which can result in the need for repeated treatments. Studies comparing laparoscopic procedures to open LR consistently report reduced blood loss and transfusions requirements, lower postoperative morbidity, and shorter hospital stays, with no differences in oncologic outcomes. In addition, laparoscopic LR is associated with reduced postoperative ascites and a lower incidence of liver failure for HCC patients with CLD, due to the reduced surgery-induced parenchymal injury to the residual liver and limited destruction of the collateral blood/lymphatic flow around the liver. Finally, this procedure facilitates subsequent repeat LR due to minimal adhesion formation and improved vision/manipulation between adhesions. These characteristics of laparoscopic LR may lead to an expansion of the indications for LR. This editorial is based on the review and meta-analysis presented at the 2(nd) International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Iwate, Japan, in October 2014 (Chairperson of the congress is Professor Go Wakabayashi from the Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine), which is published in the Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.

© 2015 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Abstract Liver resection (LR) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic liver disease (CLD) poses a high risk of serious postoperative complications and multicentric metachronous lesions requiring repeated treatment. The efficacy of laparoscopic LR (LLR) for such patients has yet to be established. The objective of this study is to test the outcomes of LLR for HCC with the aim of considering potential expansion of the indications for LLR. We performed a systematic review of the pertinent English-language literature. Our search yielded four meta-analyses and 23 comparative studies of LLR for HCC. On the basis of the findings from these studies and our newly conducted meta-analysis, the possibility for expanding the indications for LLR to HCC was examined. The studies show that LLR (vs open) for HCC generally yields better short-term outcomes without compromising long-term outcomes, and that incidences of postoperative ascites and liver failure are decreased with LLR. Several studies show the benefits of LLR for patients with severe CLD and for repeat surgery. Reductions of postoperative ascites and liver failure are among the advantages of LLR. These characteristics of LLR may allow us to expand the indications of LLR to HCC with CLD.

切除不能・進行再発大腸癌患者のうち、EGFR陰性・KRAS変異陽性で三次治療にS-1+CPT-11療法を行ったA群:14例(男性9例、女性5例、平均75.5歳)と、FIRIS試験の投与量を基にIRIS療法を行ったB群:13例(男性8例、女性5例、平均75.8歳)を対象に、有害事象の発現状況から安全性を評価した。A群/B群の原発巣(例数)は結腸10/8、直腸4/5、組織型(例数)は高分化腺癌4/3、中分化腺癌9/9、低分化腺癌1/1であった。その他の患者背景に有意差はなかった。有害事象の発現状況は、A群でGrade 3以上の発現は認めず、B群でGrade 3の白血球減少、好中球減少を各2例に、倦怠感を1例に認め、両群間に有意差を認めた。A群/B群の治療継続性の評価では、治療開始後のS-1減量例数1/3、CPT-11減量例数1/6、治療延期例数0/4、relative dose intensity(%)が90.1/74.4といずれも有意差を認め、無増悪生存期間に有意差はなかった。

© 2015 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. AIM: To assess clinical outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery and repeat hepatectomy. METHODS: This study compared the perioperative courses of patients receiving LH at our institution that had or had not previously undergone upper abdominal surgery. Of the 80 patients who underwent LH, 22 had prior abdominal surgeries, including hepatectomy (n = 12), pancreatectomy (n = 3), cholecystectomy and common bile duct excision (n = 1), splenectomy (n = 1), total gastrectomy (n = 1), colectomy with the involvement of transverse colon (n = 3), and extended hysterectomy with extensive lymph-node dissection up to the upper abdomen (n = 1). Clinical indicators including operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Eighteen of the 22 patients who had undergone previous surgery had severe adhesions in the area around the liver. However, there were no conversions to laparotomy in this group. In the 58 patients without a history of upper abdominal surgery, the median operative time was 301 min and blood loss was 150 mL. In patients with upper abdominal surgical history or repeat hepatectomy, the operative times were 351 and 301 min, and blood loss was 100 and 50 mL, respectively. The median postoperative stay was 17, 13 and 12 d for patients with no history of upper abdominal surgery, patients with a history, and patients with repeat hepatectomy, respectively. There were five cases with complications in the group with no surgical history, compared to only one case in the group with a prior history. There were no statistically significant differences in the perioperative results between the groups with and without upper abdominal surgical history, or with repeat hepatectomy. CONCLUSION: LH is feasible and safe in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery or repeat hepatectomy.

The laparoscopic approach has weaknesses in terms of its inability to provide an adequate overview of the operativefield and its lack of tactile sensation, easily leading to disorientation during surgery. This is especially true in liverresection for deeply located small tumors. Anatomic resection, which removes the portal territory of the tumorbearing area, is recommended for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because it increases the chance of removing all transportal tumor cell dissemination and secures clearance of small tumors inside the area. Preservation of residual liver volume is also required for patients with deteriorated liver function. We performed laparoscopic small(one segment or less) anatomic liver resection for a deeply located small tumor in a cirrhotic liver with preoperativethree-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) simulation. A 70-year-old man with hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis was admitted for treatment of a lesion in liver segment 6. CT demonstrated a 1.0-cm lesion deep within segment 6 between the portal branches of subsegments 6a and 6c. The patient underwent laparoscopic anatomic liver resection of subsegments 6a and 6c using 3D-CT simulation. The deeply located small HCC was contained in the resected specimen with a negative margin, and pathological examination showed well-differentiated HCC. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and he was well without recurrence 26 months postoperatively. Laparoscopic small anatomic liver resection with preoperative 3D-CT simulation facilitates removal of deeplylocated small tumors with an increased chance of removing transportal cancer cell dissemination, maximizing liverpreservation, and achieving negative-margin resection.

Although the reports of laparoscopic major liver resection are increasing, hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) close to the liver hilum and/or major hepatic veins are still considered contraindications. There is virtually no report of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for HCC which involves the main trunk of major hepatic veins. We present our method for the procedure. We experienced 6 cases: 3 right anterior, 2 left medial, and 1 right posterior extended sectionectomies with major hepatic vein resection; tumor sizes are within 40-75 (median: 60) mm. The operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay are within 341-603 (median: 434) min, 100-750 (300) ml, and 8-44 (18) days. There was no mortality and 1 patient developed postoperative pleural effusion. For these procedures, we propose that the steps listed below are useful, taking advantages of the laparoscopy-specific view. (1) The Glissonian pedicle of the section is encircled and clamped. (2) Liver transection on the ischemic line is performed in the caudal to cranial direction. (3) During transection, the clamped Glissonian pedicle and the peripheral part of hepatic vein are divided. (4) The root of hepatic vein is divided in the good view from caudal and dorsal direction.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy. The treatment of HCC is complex and complicated by the severity of associated chronic liver disease, the stage of HCC, and the clinical condition of the patient. Liver resection (LR) is one of the most efficient treatments for patients with HCC, with an expected 5-year survival of 38%-61% depending on the stage of the disease. Improved liver function assessment, increased understanding of segmental liver anatomy from advanced imaging studies, and surgical technical progress are important factors that have led to reduced mortality in patients with HCC. The indication for LR may be expanded due to emerging evidences from laparoscopic hepatectomies and combined treatments with newly developed chemotherapies. Liver transplantation (LT) is considered as an ideal treatment for removal of existing tumors and the injured/preneoplastic underlying liver tissue with impaired liver function and the risk of multicentric carcinogenesis that results from chronically injured liver. However, LT is restricted to patients with minimal risk of tumor recurrence under immunosuppression. The expansion of criteria for LT in HCC patients is still under trial and discussion. Limited availability of grafts, as well as the risk and the cost of transplantation have led to considerable interest in expansion of the donor pool, living donor-related transplantation, and combined treatment involving LR and LT. This highlight presents evidence concerning recent studies evaluating LR and LT in HCC patients. In addition, alternative therapies for the treatment of early stage tumors and the management of patients on transplant waiting lists are discussed. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Tomishige H, Morise Z, Suzuki T, Hara F, Hibi M, Kato T, Hashimoto T, World journal of clinical cases, 2014, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 157-159, 2014

症例は34歳男性。2012年2月に受けた総合健診の腹部超音波検査(US)で、胆嚢底部に大きさ17×12mmの隆起性病変を指摘され、精査のため当院を紹介された。USで有茎性、内部は比較的均一で、エコーレベルは胆嚢壁と等エコーを呈しコレステロールポリープと考えられる像であったが、造影US・CT・MRIの所見や20×9mmと増大し、直前には22×9mmであったため、胆嚢腫瘍性病変を疑い、2013年5月に腹腔鏡下胆嚢摘出術を実施した。摘出標本では大きさが20×10mmで全体に黒色を呈していた。病理組織所見はコレステロールポリープで、間質に多数のマクロファージを伴う出血が認められた。短期間で増大し、病理学的に内部に出血を認めた胆嚢コレステロールポリープは極めて稀であることから、若干の文献的考察を加えて報告した。(著者抄録)

Background: In most guidelines, no other interventional therapy but liver transplantation is recommended for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis (CP-C). However, in Japan, patients were sometimes treated with expectation of benefit. Summary: A workshop was conducted to explore the state of treatments for CP-C HCC in Japan. After the workshop, a questionnaire on therapies was given to the panelists. Clinical data of 769 patients with CP-C HCC from 8 hospitals as well as analyses of data collected by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) consisting of 1,344 CP-C HCC cases were presented. Patients who underwent liver transplantation were excluded. In total, 424 out of the 769 patients (55.1%) from the 8 hospitals and 537 out of 828 CP-C HCC cases (64.8%) from the LCSGJ data received interventional therapies, such as local ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. All panelists agreed that there was a subgroup of CP-C patients who benefitted from the locoregional therapies. The major goals for the therapies were to prevent HCC rupture and avoid obstruction of major vessels by tumor growth, which can lead to a sudden deterioration of the patients' condition. Patient liver function and tumor stage are both important factors for the decision to undergo treatment; however, the inclusion criteria for the treatments varied among the centers. Key Message: There exists a subgroup of CP-C patients who benefit from interventions for HCC. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

Morise Z, Kawabe N, Tomishige H, Nagata H, Kawase J, Arakawa S, Yoshida R, Isetani M, Frontiers in surgery, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 21, 2014

Tomishige H, Morise Z, Kawabe N, Nagata H, Ohshima H, Kawase J, Arakawa S, Yoshida R, Isetani M, World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2013, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 173-177, 2013

Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy is a less invasive procedure than conventional open hepatectomy for the resection of hepatic lesions. Increases in experiences with the technique, in combination with advances in technology, have promoted the popularity of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, indications for usage and potential contraindications of the procedure remain unresolved. The characteristics and specific advantages of the procedure, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with chronic liver diseases, are reviewed and discussed in this paper. For cirrhotic patients with liver tumors, pure laparoscopic hepatectomy minimizes destruction of the collateral blood and lymphatic flow from laparotomy and mobilization, and mesenchymal injury from compression. Therefore, pure laparoscopic hepatectomy has the specific advantage of minimal postoperative ascites production that leads to lowering the risk of disturbance in water or electrolyte balance and hypoproteinemia. It minimizes complications that routinely trigger postoperative serious liver failure. Under adequate patient positioning and port arrangement, the partial resection of the liver in the area of subphrenic space, peri-inferior vena cava area or next to the attachment of retro-peritoneum is facilitated in pure laparoscopic surgery by providing good vision and manipulation in the small operative field. Furthermore, the features of reduced post-operative adhesion, good vision, and manipulation within the small area between the adhesions make this procedure safer in the context of repeat hepatectomy procedures. These improved features are especially advantageous for patients with liver cirrhosis and multicentric and/or metachronous HCCs. © 2013 Baishideng.

Morise, Z &amp; Lau, J, 2012, , InTech.