柴崎 浩平

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the content of Reality-Shock (RS) and the recovery process from RS in Cooperating on Community-Reactivating. As a result of having interviewed 9 members of Community-Reactivating Cooperator Squad (CRCS), the following things became clear. CRCS had experienced 4 types of RS at the beginning. They are RS about “the set of work content,” “th

<p>This study identifies the property of committed non-permanent residents through a case study of the Community-Reactivating Cooperator Squad (CRCS) away from the region. As the results show, the CRCS have studied the property's behavioral aspect and established that there are purposes to visit the region such as "Parts of the work" and relation with the region without actually visiting it, such as "Mediation of the different region." In addition, they have studied the property's psy­chological aspect wherein there are emotional rela­tions such as "Contribution will" and utility-like relations such as "Side bet." From these analyses, we examine that an individual could be one of the local leading figures. Lastly, we indicate two factors to utilize non-permanent residents. First is to evaluate and support people "who commit to the region." Second is to promote not only the relative need to visit the region, but also the relative need not to do so.</p>