増野 園惠

BACKGROUND: Foster parents' unique challenges significantly impact their mental health, which in turn influences child well-being and placement stability. Although various intervention programs have been developed to support foster families, research specifically targeting foster parents' mental health as a primary outcome remains limited. Previous reviews have examined parenting stress, leaving a gap in understanding the effectiveness of interventions addressing broader mental health domains such as depression and anxiety. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of foster parent training programs in improving psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress. METHODS: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 guidelines and is registered with the Open Science Framework. Information sources will include MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and Embase, searched from inception to May 2023. An updated search will be conducted prior to final analysis. The review will include randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed English-language journals. Eligible interventions will include structured training, educational, or support programs for foster parents. Eligible comparators will include any control condition (e.g., usual care, waitlist, no intervention) or other active interventions. Primary outcomes will include psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress. Secondary outcomes will assess family-related psychological outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data will be synthesized using meta-analysis when appropriate; otherwise, narrative synthesis will be conducted the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. Subgroup analyses will explore differential effects by theoretical framework and specific mental health outcomes. The review began on May 14, 2023, with an anticipated completion date of August 31, 2025. The study is supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Grant Number JP21H03253. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will evaluate interventions targeting foster parents' mental health across multiple psychological dimensions, surpassing the limited scope of prior studies. The rigorous methodology aims to inform the development of evidence-based mental health support programs for foster parents. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/qzd43 ).

Mobile health (mHealth) is gaining interest worldwide. This randomized trial aimed to test the effects of family companionship on the prevention of social frailty among Japanese individuals aged ≥40 years using a mHealth application. We used a participant-coaching system, which included a mobile nutrition management software application and a web portal. We assessed social frailty using Bunt's framework. We enrolled 101 participants who used the application either alone (control group) or with family members (intervention group). The intervention arm showed greater improvement in social behavior and leisure activities (p = 0.004) and the total frailty score (p = 0.037). However, the social isolation did not improve with intervention. Our results suggest that mHealth can influence behavior change, but it does not resolve social isolation. While it provides convenience and enhanced access to healthcare, there is a need to balance digital efficiency with human interaction, ensuring that mHealth solutions complement, rather than replace, personal connections.

We reviewed and analyzed the existing data on vibriosis in Southeast Asia to better understand its burden and prevalent causal agents. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for studies published between January 2000 and April 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled isolation rate of non-cholera Vibrio species. Among the 1385 retrieved studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 11 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled isolation rate of non-cholera Vibrio species among diarrheal patients was 5.0 %. Most species that caused vibriosis included V. parahaemolyticus, V. mimicus, V. vulnificus, non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, and V. alginolyticus. Pooled isolation rate of V. parahaemolyticus and non-O1 V. cholerae were 7.0, and 4.0, respectively. The prevalence of vibriosis in Southeast Asia is non-negligible. Public health strategies should prioritize enhanced surveillance, and clinicians should consider vibriosis in diarrheal patients with seafood consumption history.