中島 陽一

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), an established treatment for allergic diseases, prevents the development of other allergic manifestations. Although the mechanisms remain unclear, AIT has been shown to reduce basophil activation (BA) against nontarget allergens. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess immunological changes in Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) after Japanese cedar pollen (JCP)-based subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) monotherapy. METHOD: The data of 16 patients (age: 6-37 years) with JCP-induced allergic rhinitis who were sensitive to Der f (serum Der f-specific immunoglobulin E [IgE] level >0.34 kUA/L) and received JCP-based SCIT for 5 years were reviewed retrospectively. BA by Der f and JCP extracts and serum-specific IgE and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels against these allergens were evaluated before and after completing 5 years of JCP-based SCIT monotherapy. RESULTS: The areas under the dose-response curves of BA by Der f and JCP extracts were significantly reduced (p = 0.02 and p = 0.002, respectively). JCP-specific IgE levels decreased and JCP-specific IgG4 levels increased significantly (p < 0.001 for both), whereas Der f-specific IgE and IgG4 levels did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: JCP-based SCIT monotherapy reduced Der f-specific BA. These findings suggest that JCP-based SCIT has the potential to modulate immune response toward nontarget allergens.

Objectives: Fish roe is a common allergen in Japan. We have previously reported that although immunoglobulin (IgE) from patients with salmon roe (SR) or pollock roe (PR) allergies cross-react, 70% of patients with SR allergy can consume PR without developing any symptoms. However, a correlation between clinical cross-reactivity and serological cross-reactivity remains to be demonstrated. Methods: Serum samples were collected from 15 patients with SR allergy who had consumed cooked PR previously. Among these volunteers, four had experienced immediate symptoms after consuming cooked PR, while the others had exhibited no symptoms of PR allergy. A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to analyze the serological cross-reactivity with SR and PR. Immunoblotting inhibition assays were performed using serum samples that had been pre-incubated with SR or PR extracts. Results: In ELISAs, binding to SR was inhibited by >50% when the serum samples from patients with both SR and PR allergies were pre-incubated with PR extract (p=0.0256). In immunoblots, pre-incubation of serum samples with PR extract inhibited detection of the 16-kDa protein, which likely corresponds to the major SR allergen beta' component, significantly more for samples from patients with both SR and PR allergies (100%) than for samples from those with only an SR allergy (18.2%) (p=0.011). Conclusions: The superior competitive binding of the sera from patients with both SR and PR allergies to PR compared with that to SR may induce clinical cross-reactivity between SR and PR.