石原 慎

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study is to clarify the clinicopathological and biliary morphological characteristics in reported cases of diverticular congenital biliary dilatation (CBD). METHOD: Using PubMed and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society, articles on possible diverticular CBD were extracted and the clinical pictures examined. We also sought evidence for definitions of diverticular CBD and the associated condition of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) using the original articles by Alonso-Lej and Todani. The characteristic biliary morphologies of cases with images were also investigated. RESULTS: Analyses of 211 possible cases superficially demonstrated multiple diverticula in 12 (12%) and single diverticulum in 89 (88%), with diverticula located in the upper (n = 38, 38%), middle (n = 32, 32%), or lower (n = 26, 26%) biliary tract in and presence of intra-diverticular stones, PBM, and biliary carcinoma in 23% (n = 18), 39% (n = 25), and 11% (n = 14), respectively. However, evidence defining diverticular CBD or justifying the lack of associated PBM was not demonstrated even in the original articles. Scrutiny of the biliary anatomy in 59 cases with images showed incorrect inclusions of types I or IV-A with an irregular biliary duct wall or dilated cystic duct, periampullary choledochal diverticula, or even solitary biliary cysts. Authentic diverticular CBD, representing the diverticulum connected to the middle of the common bile duct via a thin, patent stalk was seen in only 6 cases. CONCLUSION: Real diverticular CBD appears extremely rare. The lack of an objective definition allows wide interpretations of clinical pictures, creating inconsistencies in the diagnosis and treatment of CBD and raising questions regarding the utility of conventional classifications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

BACKGROUND: Data on FOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer are limited. In the JASPAC06 study-a nationwide, multicenter, observational study-FOLFIRINOX for patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer as any line of treatment showed favorable efficacy and safety in Japanese clinical practice. METHODS: We performed exploratory analyses of patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy in Japanese clinical settings. RESULTS: Of the 399 evaluable patients, 44 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The patients' characteristics were as follows: median age, 62 years; men, 26 (59%); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance status 0/1, 30 (68%)/14 (32%); disease status, recurrent/local/metastatic: 4 (9%)/8 (18%)/32 (73%). The initial dose was reduced in 28 (64%) patients. The median time to treatment failure and number of cycles were 4.5 (range, 0.2-19.1) months and 6 cycles (range, 1-13 or more), respectively. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia in 29 (66%), leucopenia in 17 (39%), anorexia in 7 (16%), febrile neutropenia in 5 (11%), and anemia in 5 (11%) patients. The median overall survival, progression-free survival, and 1-year survival rates were 10.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2-13.3), 4.1 (95% CI, 2.6-5.5) months, and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that FOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer was effective in patients with a good performance status. It displayed toxicity similar to that observed with its use as a first-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor for distal bile duct cancer. The number of lymph node metastases was adopted for nodal classification. However, different cutoff values have been proposed, ranging from two to five. METHODS: A total of 1748 cases who underwent curative surgery with pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer registered in the nationwide biliary tract cancer registry in Japan from 2008 to 2013 were included. Univariate Cox regression was performed to assess the effect of prognostic lymph node metastasis counts on mortality and to determine cutoff values. RESULTS: The overall survival rate after resection was 47.4% at 5 years. Univariate and multivariate analysis found prognostic factors to include lymph node metastasis. The cutoff point was set to two lymph node metastases using the Cox model. There were significant differences in pairwise comparisons between three groups by the number of metastatic lymph node (P < .001 for 0 vs 1-2 and P = .003 for 1-2 vs ≥3). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest lymph node classification as N0 (patients without lymph node metastases), N1 (metastasis in 1-2 regional lymph nodes), and N2 (metastases in ≥3 regional lymph nodes).

BACKGROUND: We present a case of pancreatic and splenic metastases following alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), which was successfully treated by surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old male was referred to our hospital in 2012. Computed tomography (CT) showed the presence of a pancreatic tumor. In 2002, the patient had undergone surgical resection of an ASPS of the anal region. In 2009, during follow-up, CT revealed lung metastases, which prompted surgical resection of the lung, followed by resection of the head skin in 2011. Abdominal ultrasonography (US) revealed the presence of isodense masses sized 34 mm in the pancreatic head and 60 mm within the spleen. The contrast-enhanced US revealed a solitary lesion with enhancement. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed solitary lesions with enhancement within the pancreatic head, spleen, and liver. The patient underwent metastasectomies from the pancreas, spleen, and liver. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 22 without recurrence for 18 months after metastasectomy. Twelve years after primary resection and 2 years after metastasectomy, the patient died as a consequence of multiple metastases. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented a rare case of pancreatic and spleen metastases from ASPS. Resection by radical metastasectomy was successful without morbidity. Thus, for improved survival of patients with multiple metastases from ASPS, metastasectomy may be indicated. If multiple metastases are resectable, surgical approaches may be the preferred treatment.