岩田 仲生

BACKGROUND: In order to appraise the risk-benefit balance of the three available dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs; daridorexant, lemborexant, and suvorexant) for the management of adults with insomnia, we conducted a systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis. METHODS: Included were all published double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of these agents. Outcomes included subjective time to sleep onset at month 1 (sTSO, primary), subjective total sleep time at month 1 (sTST, co-primary), subjective wake after sleep onset at month 1, Insomnia Severity Index scores at month 1, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, and the incidence of individual adverse events such as somnolence, dizziness, falls, headache, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included eight trials (5198 adults, average age = 56.33 years, 67.84% female). The treatment arms included daridorexant 25 mg/day (DAR25), daridorexant 50 mg/day (DAR50), lemborexant 5 mg/day (LEM5), lemborexant 10 mg/day (LEM10), suvorexant 20 mg/day (15 mg/day for people ≥65years, SUV20/15), and placebo. All active-treatments outperformed placebo in terms of all efficacy outcomes. The standardized mean difference (95% CI) in primary outcomes ranged from; sTSO: -0.430 (-0.568, -0.292) for LEM10 to -0.164 (-0.296, -0.031) for SUV20/15 and sTST: -0.475 (-0.593, -0.357) for DRA50 to -0.206 ( -0.330, -0.082) for LEM5. An additional sensitivity analysis suggested that DRA25, LEM10, and SUV20/15 were associated with a higher incidence of somnolence compared to a placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that there is no evidence that DORAs are associated with physiological tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, or rebound insomnia when abruptly discontinued, and that sleep architecture is not adversely affected, the DORAs appear to be a favorable choice in managing insomnia disorder in adults.

Dendritic spine abnormalities are believed to be one of the critical etiologies of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Over the past decade, the importance of microglia in brain development, particularly in synaptic elimination, has become evident. Thus, microglial abnormalities may lead to synaptic dysfunction, which may underlie the pathogenesis of ASD. Several human studies have demonstrated aberrant microglial activation in the brains of individuals with ASD, and studies in animal models of ASD have also shown a relationship between microglial dysfunction and synaptic abnormalities. However, there are very few methods available to directly assess whether phagocytosis by human microglia is abnormal. Microglia are tissue-resident macrophages with phenotypic similarities to monocyte-derived macrophages, both of which consistently exhibit pathological phenotypes in individuals with ASD. Therefore, in this study, we examined the phagocytosis capacity of human macrophages derived from peripheral blood monocytes. These macrophages were polarized into two types: those induced by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF MΦ, traditionally referred to as "M1 MΦ") and those induced by macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF MΦ, traditionally referred to as "M2 MΦ"). Synaptosomes purified from human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuron were used to assess phagocytosis capacity. Our results revealed that M-CSF MΦ exhibited higher phagocytosis capacity compared to GM-CSF MΦ, whereas ASD-M-CSF MΦ showed a marked impairment in phagocytosis. Additionally, we found a positive correlation between phagocytosis capacity and cluster of differentiation 209 expression. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the pathobiology of ASD and offers new insights into potential therapeutic targets for the disorder.

BACKGROUND: With 30%-50% of people with bipolar depression (BDep) not responding to multiple pharmacological treatments, alternative therapies are needed. Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) has been employed for individuals with pharmacological treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TR-MDD). Imaging studies have revealed reduced regional activity of the L-DLPFC for both TR-MDD and pharmacological treatment-resistant BDep (TR-BDep), suggesting that aiTBS over the L-DLPFC may be beneficial for people with TR-BDep. METHODS: A 6-week, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial will be conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of aiTBS to the L-DLPFC in people with TR-BDep (jRCTs042240019). Fifty iTBS sessions (1800 pulses/session) will be delivered in 10 daily sessions over 5 consecutive days at 90% resting motor threshold. This aiTBS protocol is termed as Fujita Neuromodulation Therapy for Bipolar Depression (FNT-BD). Twenty-two participants (both sexes, aged 18-64 years) with TR-BDep (DSM-5-TR, Type I) will be recruited. The response rate at any given week of follow-up will be the primary efficacy outcome, defined as a reduction of ≥50% in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Other outcomes will include MADRS score changes, remission rate (10 ≥ MADRS score), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, discontinuation rate, and incidence of individual adverse events. RESULTS: We anticipate that individuals who receive the aiTBS treatment show significant improvement in depressing symptoms compared to those receiving sham treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide valuable evidence for both patients with TR-BDep and clinicians.

Suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior (SB) are major public health concerns, but risk factors for their development and progression are poorly understood. We used ICD codes and a natural language processing algorithm to identify individuals in a hospital biobank with SI-only, SB, and controls without either. We compared the profiles of SB and SI-only patients to controls, and each other, using phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) and polygenic risk scores (PRS). PheWAS identified many risk factors for SB and SI-only, plus specific psychiatric disorders which may be involved in progression from SI-only to SB. PRS for suicide attempt were only associated with SB, and even after accounting for psychiatric disorder PRS. SI PRS were only associated with SI-only, although not after accounting for psychiatric disorder PRS. These findings advance understanding of distinct genetic and clinical risk factors for SB and SI-only, which will aid in early detection and intervention efforts.

Procrastination behavior has been reportedly associated with the evening preference. This study aimed to evaluate its difference between patients with circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders with phase delay (CRSWDswPD) and healthy controls in terms of evening preference and comorbid psychiatric disorders. Thirty patients with CRSWDswPD and 29 healthy participants were included. In both groups, the general procrastination scale (GPS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) were administered. Additionally, Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) and autism spectrum quotient (AQ) were also assessed in the patient group. Unexpectedly, GPS was not statistically different between patients with CRSWDswPD and healthy controls. GPS was significantly higher with lower MEQ in the healthy group, whereas the opposite tendency was observed in the patient group. Higher AQ, ASRS, and BDI tended to be associated with higher GPS in the patient group, with the first two being statistically significant. The results suggest that general procrastination is not significantly associated with CRSWDswPD, although it is associated with evening preference in healthy participants. Procrastination in the patient group may be associated with developmental disorders or depression tendencies. Future studies should include simultaneous measurement of circadian markers, other behavioral assessments, a larger population, and untreated patients.