北島 剛司

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the continuity and effectiveness of oral appliances (OAs) for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a psychiatric sleep clinic, specifically focusing on mild cases and those with psychiatric comorbidity. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the medical records of 106 OSA patients treated with OA. Survival analysis was performed to assess the discontinuation of OA use. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale were obtained from medical records. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), measured by polysomnography (PSG), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were compared between diagnosis and after post-OA treatment if a second PSG for efficacy assessment was conducted. RESULTS: Among all 106 patients, Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated a discontinuation rate of 16.8% at 1 year. This tended to be higher for OSA patients with psychiatric comorbidity (22.7%) than those without (11.6%), though it was not statistically significant (P=0.08). The overall rate of improvement in CGI-I scale was 37.7% and was significantly lower in OSA patients with psychiatric comorbidity (25.0%) than those without (48.3%). Among the 74 patients who underwent a second PSG, AHI and ESS were significantly lower after OA treatment for the entire group and subgroups of OSA severity at diagnosis and psychiatric comorbidity, except for ESS in the moderate OSA severity subgroup. CONCLUSION: OA continuation was relatively good, and sleepiness was relieved by OA use, even in mild OSA patients and those with psychiatric comorbidity. However, the continuation and subjective improvement of symptoms were slightly lower in OSA patients with psychiatric comorbidity.