城月 健太郎

Abstract Background Cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively improves the clinical symptoms of social anxiety disorder. However, there are non-responders who cannot decrease their cost/probability bias significantly; hence, their social anxiety symptoms remain unaddressed. Mindfulness training and cognitive–behavioral approaches promote a reduction in cost/probability bias and social anxiety symptoms. This study examines the effectiveness of a four-session program of mindfulness and CBT (M-CBT) in a non-clinical sample of individuals with high social anxiety. Methods Participants were 50 Japanese undergraduate students (37 women and 13 men) randomly allocated to an intervention group (n = 27) and a control group (n = 23). The intervention group underwent a four-session M-CBT program, while the control group did not receive any treatment. Results A group × time analysis of covariances showed significant interactions in the negative cognition generated when paying attention to others in probability bias, fear of negative evaluation by others, dispositional mindfulness, depressive symptoms, and subjective happiness. M-CBT also produced significant pre-post improvements in the above outcomes with moderate to high effect sizes (ds = .51–1.55). Conversely, there were no interactions in social anxiety symptoms and self-focused attention. Conclusions These results indicate that M-CBT was effective for the negative cognition generated when paying attention to others in probability bias, fear of negative evaluation by others, dispositional mindfulness, depressive symptoms, and subjective happiness. The combination of mindfulness training with cognitive restructuring is proposed as potentially helpful for individuals with probability bias, leading to negative cognition from paying attention to others. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN CTR) UMIN000036763. Registered May 16, 2019.

Abstract A four-session program of mindfulness and cognitive behavioral therapy (M-CBT) is a low-intensity treatment module for individuals with high cost/probability bias and social anxiety symptoms. We tested its effectiveness with 23 patients with social anxiety disorder. The patients completed a set of questionnaires that evaluated social anxiety symptoms, cost/probability bias, fear of negative evaluation from others, self-focused attention, trait mindfulness, depressive symptoms, cognitive reappraisal, and suppression at pretreatment, the time before each session of treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models showed that the M-CBT was effective for social anxiety symptoms, cost/probability bias, fear of negative evaluation from others, self-focused attention, trait mindfulness, depressive symptoms, and cognitive reappraisal. The M-CBT also produced significant pre-post-improvements in social anxiety symptoms and cost bias with high effect sizes (social anxiety symptoms: d = 1.04–1.06, cost bias: d = 0.82–1.02). These results suggest that M-CBT is effective for treating social anxiety symptoms and cost bias. This study demonstrates that M-CBT is feasible and acceptable for social anxiety disorder. It may comprise a treatment module for those who do not respond to traditional cognitive behavioral therapy. Trial registration number: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN CTR) UMIN000043720, Registered 23 Mar 2021.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown an association between psychological distress and emotion malleability beliefs, meaning mindsets about whether one's emotions are fixed or changeable. However, most studies have not examined the association between these beliefs and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional Internet survey of residents of Japan aged 15-79 years was conducted using sampling weights for national estimates to investigate the association between emotion malleability beliefs and sociodemographic factors and between fixed beliefs and severe psychological distress (SPD). SPD was defined as a Kessler 6 Scale score of ≥13. Adjusted odds ratios for SPD were calculated considering potential confounders. Further analyses were stratified by sex, age and presence of any psychiatric disorder. RESULTS: The analysis included 23,142 participants (female, 48.64%). Fixed beliefs were associated with female sex, age < 45 years, and presence of psychiatric disorders. These beliefs were associated with SPD, and additional analysis showed stronger associations with SPD among female respondents, respondents aged 45-59 years, and those aged ≥60 years. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that female sex, age < 45 years, and current mental disorders were associated with fixed emotion malleability beliefs. Associations between fixed emotion malleability beliefs and SPD were particularly strong among female respondents and people aged ≥45 years compared with the general population. Our study extends the association between emotion malleability beliefs and psychological health to the general population. Future studies should explore mechanisms underlying individual differences in emotion beliefs.