今高 寛晃

The genomes of various RNA viruses and a subset of human genes contain structured RNA elements termed internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs) to initiate translation in a cap-independent manner. The well-studied IRES from Hepatitis C virus (HCV) binds to eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3), but how the HCV IRES harnesses eIF3 for viral translation remains unclear. Here, we determined multiple cryo-EM structures in which the HCV IRES binds simultaneously to the ribosome and eIF3, covering steps from initiation to elongation. The eIF3 core subunits are displaced from the ribosome by binding more tightly to subdomain IIIb of the HCV IRES. However, cross-linking mass spectrometry suggested that the eIF3 noncore subunits in the HCV-IRES-mediated elongation complex remain in similar positions on the ribosome to those observed in the cap-mediated initiation complex. This currently determined configuration of eIF3 core and noncore subunits reveals the mechanisms through which the HCV IRES overcomes the competition with the host mRNA and promotes viral mRNA translation by utilizing eIF3. Interestingly, cryo-EM structures also revealed that the N-terminal domain of the eIF3 c-subunit (eIF3c-NTD) binds to the large ribosomal subunit (60S) during elongation. These findings suggest that eIF3 contributes to HCV IRES-mediated translation not only during initiation but also elongation and potentially in reinitiation. The interaction between the eIF3c-NTD and the 60S ribosome is likely to occur in general translation processes as well, contributing to 60S joining or eIF3 stabilization on the elongating ribosome.

Although eukaryotic initiation factor 2D (eIF2D) is implicated in translation initiation, reinitiation, and ribosome recycling, its precise role remains unclear. Here, we show that eIF2D promotes 40S ribosome recycling during intrinsic ribosome destabilization (IRD), a process in which ribosomes stochastically destabilize while translating proteins with consecutive acidic amino acids at their NH2-terminus. Unrecycled 40S ribosomes accumulate in eIF2D-deficient cells, leading to 80S ribosome stalling. Selective translation complex profiling (TCP-seq) reveals that eIF2D preferentially associates with IRD-prone regions. The winged helix domain, unique to eIF2D but absent in MCTS1-DENR, enhances its binding to 40S subunits, but likely clashes with ABCE1 during stop-codon-associated recycling. Loss of eIF2D reduces the expression of IRD-inducing proteins, including splicing factors. Together, these findings define a previously unappreciated role for eIF2D in 40S recycling and clarify its mechanistic divergence from the MCTS1-DENR complex.

Nucleotide repeat expansions, such as the GGGGCC repeats in C9orf72, associated with C9-ALS, are linked to neurodegenerative diseases. These repeat sequences undergo a non-canonical translation known as repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation. Unlike canonical translation, RAN translation initiates from non-AUG codons and occurs in all reading frames. To identify potential regulators of RAN translation, we employed a bottom-up approach using a human factor-based reconstituted cell-free translation system to recapitulate RAN translation. This approach revealed that omission of either eIF1A or eIF5B enhanced the translation in all reading frames of C9orf72-mediated RAN translation (C9-RAN), suggesting that eIF1A and eIF5B act as repressors of RAN translation. eIF1A and eIF5B are known to contribute to the fidelity of translation initiation. In HEK293T cells, double knockdown of eIF1A and eIF5B further promoted C9-RAN compared to single knockdowns, indicating that these factors regulate C9-RAN through distinct initiation steps. Furthermore, under eIF1A knockdown conditions, the enhancement of RAN translation via the integrated stress response (ISR) was not observed in HEK293T cells, indicating that eIF1A is involved in the ISR-mediated non-AUG translation.