太陽系科学研究系

Hiroshi Hasegawa

  (長谷川 洋)

Profile Information

Affiliation
Assistant Professor, Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Department of Solar System Sciences, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

J-GLOBAL ID
200901040603353226
Researcher ID
A-1192-2007
researchmap Member ID
6000000662

External link

Papers

 161
  • K. A. Blasl, A. Settino, R. Nakamura, H. Hasegawa, T. K. M. Nakamura, M. Hosner
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 129(11), Nov 15, 2024  Peer-reviewed
    Abstract We examine characteristics of the boundaries of 11 Kelvin‐Helmholtz vortex crossings observed by MMS on 23 September 2017 under southward IMF conditions. At both the leading and trailing edges, boundary regions of mixed plasma are observed together with lower‐hybrid wave activity. We found that thicker boundary regions feature a higher number of sub‐ion scale current sheets, of which only one shows clear reconnection signatures. Moreover, the lower‐hybrid waves along the vortex spine region are identified as an effective mechanism for plasma transport with an estimated diffusion coefficient of s. Comparisons with 3D simulations performed under the same conditions as the MMS event suggest that the extension of the boundary regions as well as the number of current sheets are related to different evolutionary stages of the vortices. Such observations can be explained by changes in the upstream magnetic field conditions.
  • H. Hasegawa, M. R. Argall, N. Aunai, R. Bandyopadhyay, N. Bessho, I. J. Cohen, R. E. Denton, J. C. Dorelli, J. Egedal, S. A. Fuselier, P. Garnier, V. Génot, D. B. Graham, K. J. Hwang, Y. V. Khotyaintsev, D. B. Korovinskiy, B. Lavraud, Q. Lenouvel, T. C. Li, Y.-H. Liu, B. Michotte de Welle, T. K. M. Nakamura, D. S. Payne, S. M. Petrinec, Y. Qi, A. C. Rager, P. H. Reiff, J. M. Schroeder, J. R. Shuster, M. I. Sitnov, G. K. Stephens, M. Swisdak, A. M. Tian, R. B. Torbert, K. J. Trattner, S. Zenitani
    Space Science Reviews, 220(6), Sep 2, 2024  Peer-reviewedLead authorCorresponding author
    Abstract There is ample evidence for magnetic reconnection in the solar system, but it is a nontrivial task to visualize, to determine the proper approaches and frames to study, and in turn to elucidate the physical processes at work in reconnection regions from in-situ measurements of plasma particles and electromagnetic fields. Here an overview is given of a variety of single- and multi-spacecraft data analysis techniques that are key to revealing the context of in-situ observations of magnetic reconnection in space and for detecting and analyzing the diffusion regions where ions and/or electrons are demagnetized. We focus on recent advances in the era of the Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, which has made electron-scale, multi-point measurements of magnetic reconnection in and around Earth’s magnetosphere.
  • Abraham Chian, Rodrigo Miranda, Cesar Bertucci, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, Joe Borovsky, Sergio Dasso, Ezequiel Echer, Adriane Franco, Kirolosse M. Girgis, J. Americo Gonzalez-Esparza, Tohru Hada, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Syau-Yun Hsieh, Primoz Kajdič, Christian Mazelle, Erico Rempel, Diana Rojas-Castillo, Beatriz Sanchez-Cano, David Sibeck, Marina Stepanova, José Valdés-Galicia, Juan Valdivia
    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 106253-106253, May, 2024  Peer-reviewed
  • Shuo Wang, Ying Zou, Qiang Hu, Xueling Shi, Hiroshi Hasegawa
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 129(2), Feb 7, 2024  Peer-reviewed
    Abstract Flux transfer events (FTEs) are a type of magnetospheric phenomena that exhibit distinctive observational signatures from the in situ spacecraft measurements. They are generally believed to possess a magnetic field configuration of a magnetic flux rope and formed through magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause, sometimes accompanied with enhanced plasma convection in the ionosphere. We examine two FTE intervals under the condition of southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) with a dawn‐dusk component. We apply the Grad‐Shafranov (GS) reconstruction method to the in situ measurements by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft to derive the magnetic flux contents associated with the FTE flux ropes. In particular, given a cylindrical magnetic flux rope configuration derived from the GS reconstruction, the magnetic flux content can be characterized by both the toroidal (axial) and poloidal fluxes. We then estimate the amount of magnetic flux (i.e., the reconnection flux) encompassed by the area “opened” in the ionosphere, based on the ground‐based Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) observations. We find that for event 1, the FTE flux rope is oriented in the approximate dawn‐dusk direction, and the amount of its total poloidal magnetic flux falls within the range of the corresponding reconnection flux. For event 2, the FTE flux rope is oriented in the north‐south direction. Both the FTE flux and the reconnection flux have greater uncertainty. We provide a detailed description about a formation scenario of sequential magnetic reconnection between adjacent field lines based on the FTE flux rope configurations from our results.
  • Richard E. Denton, Yi‐Hsin Liu, Jefferson A. Agudelo Rueda, Kevin J. Genestreti, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Martin Hosner, Roy B. Torbert, James L. Burch
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 129(1), Jan 17, 2024  Peer-reviewed
    Abstract An LMN coordinate system for magnetic reconnection events is sometimes determined by defining N as the direction of the gradient across the current sheet and L as the direction of maximum variance of the magnetic field. The third direction, M, is often assumed to be the direction of zero gradient, and thus the orientation of the X line. But when there is a guide field, the X line direction may have a significant component in the L direction defined in this way. For a 2D description, a coordinate system describing such an event would preferably be defined using a different coordinate direction M′ oriented along the X line. Here we use a 3D particle‐in‐cell simulation to show that the X line is oriented approximately along the direction bisecting the asymptotic magnetic field directions on the two sides of the current sheet. We describe two possible ways to determine the orientation of the X line from spacecraft data, one using the minimum gradient direction from Minimum Directional Derivative analysis at distances of the order of the current sheet thickness from the X line, and another using the bisection direction based on the asymptotic magnetic fields outside the current sheet. We discuss conditions for validity of these estimates, and we illustrate these conditions using several Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) events. We also show that intersection of a flux rope due to secondary reconnection with the primary X line can destroy invariance along the X line and negate the validity of a two‐dimensional description.

Misc.

 25

Books and Other Publications

 2

Presentations

 127

Professional Memberships

 1

Research Projects

 7