Katsuya Hasegawa

The human being dynamically and highly controls the head-trunk with redundant mechanical structures to maintain a stable upright standing position that is inherently unstable. The posture control strategies are also affected by the differences in the conditions of sensory inputs. However, it is unclear how the head-trunk segmental properties are altered to respond to situations that require appropriate changes in standing posture control strategies. We used a data-driven approach to conduct a multipoint measurement of head-trunk sway control in a quiet standing position with differences in the conditions of sensory inputs. Healthy young subjects with 22 accelerometers attached to their backs were evaluated for head-trunk vibration during quiet standing under two conditions: one with open eyes and one with closed eyes. The synchronization of the acceleration and the instantaneous phase was then calculated. The results showed that the synchronization of acceleration and instantaneous phase varied depending on the visual condition, and there were some continuous coherent patterns in each condition. Findings were that the structural redundancy of the head-trunk, which is multi-segmental and has a high mass ratio in the whole body, must be adjusted adaptively according to the conditions to stabilize upright standing in human-specific bipeds.

BACKGROUND: During walking, the friction between the foot and the ground surface causes a free moment (FM), which influences the torsional stress on the lower extremity. However, few studies have investigated the FM during natural walking. The main aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the FM and the absolute and relative rotation angles of the foot and pelvis. METHODS: The rotation angles of foot and pelvic were measured in 18 healthy men using a motion capture system. Rotation angles were measured in absolute and relative coordinates as well as in reference to the line connecting the center of pressure (CoP) line under the right and left feet to evaluate the effects of the opposite lower limb on the FM. The absolute and relative rotation angles of the foot and pelvis were entered into forced-entry linear regression models to evaluate the influence on the FM. FINDINGS: Only the relative angle of rotation between the foot and pelvis could explain the prediction equations significantly. In the Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient, the rotation angles of the foot and pelvis defined using the bilateral CoP points had not significantly correlated with FM. No joint rotation movement was correlated with FM. INTERPRETATION: The torsion of the entire lower extremity should be performed principally through hip internal rotation. When evaluating the FM as a torsional stress, focusing on the rotation of the entire lower extremity, rather than on one segment, is beneficial.